concord, agreement and suppletion

Jonathan David Bobaljik jonathan.bobaljik at MCGILL.CA
Tue Jan 14 19:57:06 UTC 2003


Dear Ora:

At 23:56 +0100 1/13/03, Ora Matushansky wrote:
>Would anyone know if the following three phenomena are possible:
>(1)	Definiteness agreement: the main verb/predicate reflects the
>definiteness of the subject. Things like the Hebrew accusative "et" on
>definite objects and Spanish "a" don't count :)

For whatever it's worth, Hungarian object agreement is described in
this way (though with complexities). References include work by
Szabolcsi, e.g., in Kiefer & E. Kiss, 1994, Syntactic Struct of H;
Synt/Sem 27, Academic Press. See H. Bartos, in U Penn Working Papers
4.2 (1997) for important critique of this position, and an
alternative.

I'd be interested in a summary of responses, if you are getting
responses off-list as well.

Best,

-Jonathan
--
_______________________
Jonathan David Bobaljik
Department of Linguistics
McGill University
1085 Dr. Penfield
Montreal PQ H3A 1A7
CANADA

tel: (514) 398-4224
fax: (514) 398-7088

http://www.arts.mcgill.ca/programs/linguistics/faculty/bobaljik



More information about the Dm-list mailing list