PIE e/o Ablaut

proto-language proto-language at email.msn.com
Mon Apr 3 05:32:15 UTC 2000


Dear Pete and IEists:

 ----- Original Message -----
From: "petegray" <petegray at btinternet.com>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 12:14 PM

>> 1) Sanskrit ... is more adequately described as: /a/, /a:/, /e:/, /i/,
>> /i:/, /o:/, /u/, /u:/.

> Sanskrit also had short (!!) [e] and [o] as allophones of /e/ and /o/ before
> a non-elided initial /a/ - according to MacDonell, A Vedic Reader, p20.

[PR]

To my way of thinking, you have described a classic situation of a
conditioned phone [e,o] of /e:,o:/ before initial {a-}.

I am concerned only with the phonemic status of e:, o:.

Pat

PATRICK C. RYAN | PROTO-LANGUAGE at email.msn.com (501) 227-9947 * 9115 W. 34th
St. Little Rock, AR 72204-4441 USA WEBPAGES: PROTO-LANGUAGE:
http://www.geocities.com/proto-language/ and PROTO-RELIGION:
http://www.geocities.com/proto-language/proto-religion/indexR.html "Veit ek,
at ek hekk, vindga meipi, nftr allar nmu, geiri undapr . . . a ~eim meipi er
mangi veit hvers hann af rstum renn." (Havamal 138)



More information about the Indo-european mailing list