Leiter R vs WPPSI with 3- and 4-year-olds

Laura Morett lmorett at ucsc.edu
Mon Aug 15 15:00:24 UTC 2011


If you only need a nonverbal measure, another option would be Raven's
Progressive Matrices, which has been used successfully with nonverbal
populations (autistics).  I believe there is an age-appropriate
version that is part of the WPPSI, but you may also be able to
purchase it separately.  I'd suggest that or the Corsi Block test if
you are only looking for a measure of non-verbal intelligence.

Regards,
Laura Morett


On Aug 15, 5:00 am, "Alcock, Katie" <k.j.alc... at lancaster.ac.uk>
wrote:
> Do you actually need a non-verbal IQ score, or do you just need some
> form of non-verbal ability test, which you could use to match children
> (of the same age) or co-vary against a verbal score (again with the same
> age group), or even from which you could obtain a standard score for
> every child (regardless of age)?
>
> Because if you want to do one of those things (rather than actually
> obtain an IQ score) you can just use a subtest of the WPPSI, or of the
> BAS (we usually use Block Design from the BAS). You can still compare
> children and obtain a standard score on that one test.
>
> Katie
>
> From: info-childes at googlegroups.com
> [mailto:info-childes at googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kirsten Abbot-Smith
> Sent: 13 August 2011 10:36
> To: info-childes at googlegroups.com
> Subject: Leiter R vs WPPSI with 3- and 4-year-olds
>
> Hi everybody,
> I need to assess non-verbal IQ for an intervention study with 3- and
> 4-year-olds with language and communication disorders. I therefore will
> have to fork out a considerable amount of money for a test. I am
> currently tossing up between the Leiter R (which claims to be the only
> truly non-verbal test) and the Wechsler Pre-school and Primary Scale of
> Intelligence (which seems to be more widely used).
>
> Does anyone have any experience comparing the advantages and
> disadvantages of using these two tests with this age group? I am quite
> wary of using lengthy and boring tests with a group which are not
> exactly known for their ability to maintain sustained attention and / or
> understand verbal instructions!
>
> Many thanks in advance,
> Kirsten
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Info-CHILDES" group.
> To post to this group, send email to info-childes at googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> info-childes+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/info-childes?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Info-CHILDES" group.
To post to this group, send email to info-childes at googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to info-childes+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/info-childes?hl=en.



More information about the Info-childes mailing list