[Lexicog] agreed-upon minimum size for lexicographic corpora

Tsvi Sadan tsvi.sadan@gmail.com [lexicographylist] lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com
Mon Jul 4 12:02:43 EDT 2016


I wonder if there is any agreed-upon minimum size for lexicographic
corpora though, for example, Atkins and Rundell write that there is no
such definitive minimum size in their "Oxford Guide to Practical
Lexicography" (2008: 61).


Does anyone on this list know publications that propose such minimal
size even if the proposed numbers have not been accepted by other
lexicographers?


Thank you very much in advance.


-- 
Tsvi Sadan
Senior Lecturer in Hebrew and Semitic Languages
Bar-Ilan University, Israel
http://biu.academia.edu/tsvisadan/


------------------------------------
Posted by: Tsvi Sadan <tsvi.sadan at gmail.com>
------------------------------------


------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lexicographylist/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lexicographylist/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    lexicographylist-digest at yahoogroups.com 
    lexicographylist-fullfeatured at yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    lexicographylist-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/



More information about the Lexicography mailing list