[Lexicog] agreed-upon minimum size for lexicographic corpora

Jiří Vedral slovnik@post.cz [lexicographylist] lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com
Mon Jul 4 12:35:57 EDT 2016


Hi, I Think that some “psychologic low limit” should be one million…


It is not probably strictly written


 


JVEDRAL






 


From: lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com [mailto:lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 12:36 PM
To: lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Lexicog] agreed-upon minimum size for lexicographic corpora


 


  


I wonder if there is any agreed-upon minimum size for lexicographic
corpora though, for example, Atkins and Rundell write that there is no
such definitive minimum size in their "Oxford Guide to Practical
Lexicography" (2008: 61).


Does anyone on this list know publications that propose such minimal
size even if the proposed numbers have not been accepted by other
lexicographers?


Thank you very much in advance.


-- 
Tsvi Sadan
Senior Lecturer in Hebrew and Semitic Languages
Bar-Ilan University, Israel
http://biu.academia.edu/tsvisadan/










---
Tato zpráva byla zkontrolována na viry programem Avast Antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lexicography/attachments/20160704/e8ea680b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Lexicography mailing list