[Lexicog] agreed-upon minimum size for lexicographic corpora

Jiří Vedral slovnik@post.cz [lexicographylist] lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com
Mon Jul 4 12:35:57 EDT 2016

Hi, I Think that some “psychologic low limit” should be one million…

It is not probably strictly written




From: lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com [mailto:lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 12:36 PM
To: lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Lexicog] agreed-upon minimum size for lexicographic corpora



I wonder if there is any agreed-upon minimum size for lexicographic
corpora though, for example, Atkins and Rundell write that there is no
such definitive minimum size in their "Oxford Guide to Practical
Lexicography" (2008: 61).

Does anyone on this list know publications that propose such minimal
size even if the proposed numbers have not been accepted by other

Thank you very much in advance.

Tsvi Sadan
Senior Lecturer in Hebrew and Semitic Languages
Bar-Ilan University, Israel

Tato zpráva byla zkontrolována na viry programem Avast Antivirus.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lexicography/attachments/20160704/e8ea680b/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Lexicography mailing list