6.559 Qs: Literature search, Nepali, Hist of @ sign, Vowels after [hw]

[The Linguist List]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-6-559. Thu 13 Apr 1995. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines: 139
 
Subject: 6.559 Qs: Literature search, Nepali, Hist of @ sign, Vowels after [hw]
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Asst. Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
               Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
               Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
               Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
 
                           REMINDER
[We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.]
 
-------------------------Directory-------------------------------------
 
1)
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 1995 13:45:48 -0600 (CST)
From: Niels van der Mast (Niels.vanderMast at let.ruu.nl)
Subject: query: literature on lexical means to invoke strong/weak commitment
 
2)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 09:55:06 +0100
From: Gilles.Boye at linguist.jussieu.fr (Gilles Boye)
Subject: Nepali
 
3)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 07:49:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Henry Rogers (rogers at epas.utoronto.ca)
Subject: query
 
4)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 08:24:14 -0400
From: Alexis Manaster Ramer (amr at CS.Wayne.EDU)
Subject: Q: vowel changes after [hw]
 
-------------------------Messages--------------------------------------
1)
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 1995 13:45:48 -0600 (CST)
From: Niels van der Mast (Niels.vanderMast at let.ruu.nl)
Subject: query: literature on lexical means to invoke strong/weak commitment
 
Query: literature on lexical means to invoke strong/weak commitment
 
Dear netters,
 
In the area of modal auxiliaries, the distinctions between
"desires/permission" and "certainties/obligations" (want/may vs.
shall/must), or between "possibilities" and "certainties/
necessities" (can/may vs. shall/must) are well described. In my
research project I am investigating the way interaction and/or
collaboration influences (i.a.) the linguistic form of texts. From
looking at some data, it became apparent that writers frequently
in fact use LEXICAL means to invoke the same difference that is so
well known in the area of modals. Sometimes they are writing with a
high degree of commitment as to the contents or outcome of certain
policies (using predicates like "is necessary", "is unavoidable"),
but especially for lesser degrees of commitment, a whole lot of
different things can be used (some aspect "will receive attention",
or some type of action "is to be preferred", etcetera).
 
Now what I would like to know is if there is any literature in which
lexical meanings, esp. of verbs and adjectives, are discussed/
analyzed in terms of such distinctions as are common in the area of
modals.
 
I'll be happy to post a summary of the responses to the net.
 
Thanks in advance!
--Niels
 
============================================================
Niels van der Mast
Centre for Language and Communication - Utrecht University
Trans 10
3512 JK  Utrecht
The Netherlands
 
phone:  +31 30 - 53 8087 (office)
fax:    +31 30 - 53 6000
e-mail: Niels.vanderMast at let.ruu.nl
============================================================
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 09:55:06 +0100
From: Gilles.Boye at linguist.jussieu.fr (Gilles Boye)
Subject: Nepali
 
Dear Linguist,
 
I would be very grateful if you could provide me with information
(phonological, morphological, syntactical and/or semantical) about Nepali ,
the national language of Nepal. (English, French and Nepali documents'
references preferably.)
 
Many thanks in advance.
 
Gilles Boye
Gilles.Boye at Linguist.Jussieu.fr
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
3)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 07:49:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Henry Rogers (rogers at epas.utoronto.ca)
Subject: query
 
I am looking for information on the history of @ (the at sign).
 
In a more general way, does anyone know of a general
reference to the history of such signs ( # $ % &) and/or punctuation.
 
Thanks
 
Henry Rogers                      rogers at epas.utoronto.ca
Dept. of Linguistics
University of Toronto                   vox: 416-978-1769
Toronto, Ont., Canada, M5S 1A1          fax: 416-971-2688
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
4)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 08:24:14 -0400
From: Alexis Manaster Ramer (amr at CS.Wayne.EDU)
Subject: Q: vowel changes after [hw]
 
Does anybody know of sound changes affecting vowel quality
only in the environment after [hw].  I find myself having
to assume that this happened in Tubatulabal, with [a]) [i-]
(barred i, that is) and [i-]) [o] in this environment, and
I would like to find some parallels.
 
Alexis Manaster Ramer
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-6-559.