9.227, Sum: Syntax and Semantics of "Photograph"

[The LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-9-227. Sat Feb 14 1998. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 9.227, Sum: Syntax and Semantics of "Photograph"

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Review Editor:     Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
		    Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
		    Elaine Halleck <elaine at linguistlist.org>
                    Anita Huang <anita at linguistlist.org>
                    Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Julie Wilson <julie at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/


Editor for this issue: James German <james at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 12 Feb 1998 16:02:06 -0600
From:  Graeme Forbes <forbes at mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu>
Subject:  Re: Syntax and Semantics of "Photograph"

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 12 Feb 1998 16:02:06 -0600
From:  Graeme Forbes <forbes at mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu>
Subject:  Re: Syntax and Semantics of "Photograph"


Thanks to the many people who responded to my query about why you can
say (1) but can't say (2):

(1) I saw John leave.
(2) I photographed John leave.

Other sensory verbs like "smelled", "heard", "sense", pattern with
"saw" (maybe you-know-who could smell Monica arrive in the outer
office, because of her perfume), while the likes of "taped", "filmed"
etc.  pattern with "photograph". Only 1 person disputed the data (I'm
assured that (2) is ok in Australia).

The explanations I liked most were from Brian Ulicny and Michael Swan.
Ulicny points out that on Hale/Keyser theories of incorporation,
"photograph" derives from "took a photograph of" and carries its
syntax, and you can't have "photograph of John leave". Swan points
out, in effect, that (1) implies John left, while you can photograph
John leaving even if he then gets stopped and doesn't leave, so the
difference between an event-in-progress and a culminated event may be
relevant.

Graeme Forbes

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-9-227