9.136, Qs: Thematic roles, Chomsky/Levi-Strauss

[The LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-9-136. Wed Jan 28 1998. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 9.136, Qs: Thematic roles, Chomsky/Levi-Strauss

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <seely at linguistlist.org>

Review Editor:     Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editor: Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
                    Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
                    Anita Huang <anita at linguistlist.org>
                    Julie Wilson <julie at linguistlist.org>
                    Elaine Halleck <elaine at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/


Editor for this issue: Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Wed, 28 Jan 1998 20:27:19 +1000
From:  Stuart.Robinson at anu.edu.au (Stuart Robinson)
Subject:  passivisation and thematic roles

2)
Date:  Wed, 28 Jan 1998 10:57:22 -0500
From:  PCARINO <Paula_Carino at usccmail.lehman.com>
Subject:  CHOMSKY/LEVI-STRAUSS GRUDGE MATCH

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Wed, 28 Jan 1998 20:27:19 +1000
From:  Stuart.Robinson at anu.edu.au (Stuart Robinson)
Subject:  passivisation and thematic roles

Can anyone recommend work on thematic roles-particularly as they relate to
passiviation? I'm looking for works post-dating (and perhaps in response
to) Jackendoff's (1972) proposed constraint on passivisation in English,
which is basically as follows--the thematic role of the object of the"by"
phrase must outrank the subject on the following hierarchy: agent <
location/source/goal < theme. I'd like to see how or whether this
constraint works for other languages. (I know passivisation is highly
productive in many Bantu languages, but I'm not sure whether any trace of
such a hierarchy could be found nonetheless.) And I'd like to learn of
counterexamples in English.

Regards,
Stuart Robinson

-

Stuart Robinson <Stuart.Robinson at anu.edu.au>
Linguistics Department
Australian National University
Canberra ACT 0200
FAX: 61-6-279-8214


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Wed, 28 Jan 1998 10:57:22 -0500
From:  PCARINO <Paula_Carino at usccmail.lehman.com>
Subject:  CHOMSKY/LEVI-STRAUSS GRUDGE MATCH

Hi folks--

I'm not a linguist (but I play one on TV), just a curious layperson who
wants to know where Levi-Strauss and Chomsky part ways.  I understand
that L-S was an anthropologist so his focus and intent are different
from Chomsky's, but in terms of "rules" and "deep structure", are the
two simpatico?

If possible, please respond privately, as I do not subscribe to this
mailing list.

Thank you!

Paula












---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-9-136