10.648, Sum: Raising Predicates in English

LINGUIST Network linguist at linguistlist.org
Sun May 2 02:56:43 UTC 1999


LINGUIST List:  Vol-10-648. Sat May 1 1999. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 10.648, Sum: Raising Predicates in English

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors:  Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
                    Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
                    Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Scott Fults <scott at linguistlist.org>
		    Jody Huellmantel <jody at linguistlist.org>
		    Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Chris Brown <chris at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/


Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Sat, 1 May 1999 17:19:32 +0900 (JST)
From:  a981704m at mbox.media.nagoya-u.ac.jp (Yamaguchi Atsuko)
Subject:  Raising predicates in English

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Sat, 1 May 1999 17:19:32 +0900 (JST)
From:  a981704m at mbox.media.nagoya-u.ac.jp (Yamaguchi Atsuko)
Subject:  Raising predicates in English

Dear linguists,

I asked the members of LINGUIST about the grammatical
judgments of the following sentences:

(1) How likely to be intelligent is John?
(2) How likely to win the prize is John?
(3) John seems likely to be intelligent.
(4) John seems likely to win the prize.
(5) John seems to be intelligent.
(6) John seems to win the prize.

Then 35 native English speakers replied to me.
I would like to thank them and
I am sorry that I had not report on it for about half year.

Their judglinguist at linguistlist.orgments are as follows.
(P01-35 stand for each of the people
 who judge the above sentences.
 S1-6 stand for each of the above sentences
 in (1-6), respectively.)
(OK    ?     ??    *?    *
 acceptable----------unacceptable)

(P01) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6  *
(P02) S1  ?, S2  ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6  *(context-sensitive)
(P03) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P04) S1  *, S2 *?, S3 ??, S4  ?, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P05) S1  ?, S2  ?, S3  ?, S4  ?, S5 OK, S6  *
(P06) S1  ?, S2  ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P07) S1  ?, S2  ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P08) S1 *?, S2  ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6  *
(P09) S1  ?, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P10) S1  ?, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P11) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P12) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P13) S1  ?, S2  ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P14) S1  *, S2 *?, S3  *, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6  *
(P15) S1  ?, S2  ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P16) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ?(context-sensitive)
(P17) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6  *
(P18) S1  ?, S2  ?, S3  ?, S4  ?, S5 OK, S6  ?
(P19) S1  *, S2 OK, S3  *, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6  *(context-sensitive)
(P20) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ?(context-sensitive)
(P21) S1 ??, S2 OK, S3 ??, S4 ??, S5 OK, S6 *
(P22) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6  ?
(P23) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P24) S1  *, S2  *, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P25) S1  ?, S2  ?, S3  ?, S4  ?, S5 OK, S6  ?(context-sensitive)
(P26) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P27) S1  *, S2  *, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P28) S1 ??, S2  ?, S3 ??, S4  ?, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P29) S1 ??, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ??(context-sensitive)
(P30) S1  ?, S2  ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P31) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 ??, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P33) S1  ?, S2  ?, S3  ?, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ??(context-sensitive)
(P34) S1  ?*, S2  ?, S3 ?*, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6  *
(P35) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK

The judgments of (1-4,  6) vary according to the speakers.

Several people say that (1-2) is  marginal or awkward.
Some of them judge (2) to be better than (1).
Many people point out that they prefer
"How likely to ... is John" to "How likely is John to ... ".

One informant says that "It seems likely that ... " is better in (3-4).
Another informant says that "seems" and "likely"
mean the same, so the sentence in (3) is overloaded.

All of the people judge (5) to be gramatical.
However, (6) varies according to the speakers.
Many people point out that the judgment depends on the context and
that "John seems to win all the prize" is OK.

Thanks again.

Atsuko Yamaguchi
A graduate student in Nagoya university in Japan
a981704m at mbox.media.nagoya-u.ac.jp




---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-10-648



More information about the Linguist mailing list