13.1035, Diss: Text/Corpus Ling: Tanaka "Annotated Corpus..."

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Mon Apr 15 19:32:58 UTC 2002


LINGUIST List:  Vol-13-1035. Mon Apr 15 2002. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 13.1035, Diss: Text/Corpus Ling: Tanaka "Annotated Corpus..."

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Consulting Editor:
        Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Editors (linguist at linguistlist.org):
	Karen Milligan, WSU 		Naomi Ogasawara, EMU
	James Yuells, EMU		Marie Klopfenstein, WSU
	Michael Appleby, EMU		Heather Taylor-Loring, EMU
	Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U.	Richard John Harvey, EMU
	Dina Kapetangianni, EMU		Renee Galvis, WSU
	Karolina Owczarzak, EMU

Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
          Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.



Editor for this issue: Karolina Owczarzak <karolina at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Fri, 12 Apr 2002 21:34:27 +0000
From:  tanaka_kun at hotmail.com
Subject:  Text/Corpus Ling: Tanaka "Annotated Corpus in The Investigation of ..."

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Fri, 12 Apr 2002 21:34:27 +0000
From:  tanaka_kun at hotmail.com
Subject:  Text/Corpus Ling: Tanaka "Annotated Corpus in The Investigation of ..."


New Dissertation Abstract

Institution: Lancaster University
Program: Department of Linguistics and Modern English Language
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2000

Author: Izumi Tanaka

Dissertation Title:
The Value of an Annotated Corpus in The Investigation of Anaphoric
Pronouns, with Particular Reference to Backwards Anaphora in English

Linguistic Field: Text/Corpus Linguistics
Subject Language: English

Dissertation Director 1: Geoffrey N Leech
Dissertation Director 2: Anthony M McEnery


Dissertation Abstract:

This thesis investigates English personal pronoun reference in
particular focusing on cataphora (backwards anaphora), using the
Anaphoric Treebank (AT), which is a written English corpus with
discourse annotation, and other corpus data.  The analysis of corpus
data reveals certain coreferential cataphora patterns (in particular
in the initial adverbial or initial direct speech constructions).  On
the basis of the corpus data, the claims on cataphora made by
generative approaches and cognitive discourse theories are
tested.

The points which became clear in testing generative approaches
are:
(1) The result of an informant test indicates the inadequacy of
narrowly restricting data to invented examples.
(2) The lack of understanding of the scope of the application of the
theory can be observed in Reinhart (1984) and Binding theories.
(3) A sentential-level approach to investigate pronoun references is
inadequate.

The points which became clear in testing cognitive discourse
theories are:
(i) First mention cataphora and Overriding-type of cataphora clearly
show that there is such a phenomenon that can be called cataphora,
contrary to the sceptical view on cataphora.
(ii) These cataphora data indicate that a pronoun reference can be
made not only for an already-mentioned entity but also for a new
discourse entity.

Also the analysis of the borderline cases (anaphora/cataphora) reveals
that in certain conditions, the reference-direction
(anaphora/cataphora) judgement tends to involve a triple-choice
(anaphoric /cataphoric /indeterminate).

In order to account for the corpus data of cataphoric pronouns, the
following suggestions can be made:
(i) It is necessary, from readers' perspective, to assume that a
personal pronoun creates a temporal information gathering point in
some kind of the reader's short term memory.
(ii) The reference-direction judgement of a personal pronoun
(anaphora/cataphora) tends to reflect the way in which a reader
perceives focus of attention (highlight) when the reader resolves the
pronoun reference.








---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-13-1035



More information about the Linguist mailing list