15.3553, Qs: Critical Period Hypothesis; Protosyllabic Fossils

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Tue Dec 21 17:27:07 UTC 2004


LINGUIST List: Vol-15-3553. Tue Dec 21 2004. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 15.3553, Qs: Critical Period Hypothesis; Protosyllabic Fossils

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org)
        Sheila Collberg, U of Arizona
        Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Steven Moran <steve at linguistlist.org>
================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.


===========================Directory==============================

1)
Date: 21-Dec-2004
From: Erinn Di Staulo < erinndistaulo at lemonsplit.com >
Subject: Critical Period Hypothesis History

2)
Date: 21-Dec-2004
From: Bart de Boer < b.de.boer at AI.RUG.NL >
Subject: Protosyllabic Fossils


-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 12:24:57
From: Erinn Di Staulo < erinndistaulo at lemonsplit.com >
Subject: Critical Period Hypothesis History


I'm looking for some opinions regarding the first mention of the Critical
Period Hypothesis or its antecedents in published literature.

Early acquisition studies were very basic and involved very little actual
science in many cases. However, over time, actual theories have developed.
The earliest discussion of a critical period (not necessarily by that name)
is not easily attribuable  to one author, although it is part of most current
discussions of first and second language acquisition and the focus of studies of
so-called 'feral' children.

Most pre-Chomsky investigation of acquisition is purely behaviorist in
nature (Skinner, Piaget) and although valid observational conclusions are
drawn, it is unclear if the genesis of the CP hypothesis is to be found in
this type of work.

Linguistic Field(s): Language Acquisition




-------------------------Message 2 ----------------------------------
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 12:25:00
From: Bart de Boer < b.de.boer at AI.RUG.NL >
Subject: Protosyllabic Fossils



As part of my research into the evolution of speech I am interested in what
Jackendoff (in chapter 8 of Foundations of Language) 'Protosyllabic
Fossils'. These are learned and meaningful utterances that do not fit the
honotactics/phonology of a language, such as (Jackendoff's examples) shh,
psst, 'm-hm (yes), 'm-'m (no) and the apical click to express disapporoval
(tsk-tsk). I am interested in the cross-linguistic occurrence and use of
these utterances. Has this been studied before, and if yes what would be
the reference? In any case I am interested in examples of such utterances
in other languages, preferrably non-western ones (as examples of western
languages are more easily obtained).

Bart de Boer

Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics
                     Typology






-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-15-3553





More information about the Linguist mailing list