16.150, Qs: NP's with +human feature; LaTex Stylefile

[LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List: Vol-16-150. Tue Jan 18 2005. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 16.150, Qs: NP's with +human feature; LaTex Stylefile

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org)
        Sheila Collberg, U of Arizona
        Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Steven Moran <steve at linguistlist.org>
================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.


===========================Directory==============================

1)
Date: 18-Jan-2005
From: Ilhan Cagri < ilhan at umd.edu >
Subject: NP's with +human feature

2)
Date: 18-Jan-2005
From: Line Mikkelsen < mikkelse at socrates.Berkeley.EDU >
Subject: LaTex Stylefile

	
-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:19:58
From: Ilhan Cagri < ilhan at umd.edu >
Subject: NP's with +human feature


In Turkish, I am coming up with intervention effects in relative clauses
with +human NP subjects but not in identical clauses with nonhuman
subjects.  For example, ''the mother whose child lions ate'' is good, but
''the deer whose fawn hunters ate'' is bad.  I have many such examples
where the only difference is that the external argument is either + or
-human.  Has anyone else noticed effects of a +human feature on an NP in
any language?  Please email me at ilhan at umd.edu. Thanks.

Ilhan Cagri

Linguistic Field(s): Syntax



	
-------------------------Message 2 ----------------------------------
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:20:00
From: Line Mikkelsen < mikkelse at socrates.Berkeley.EDU >
Subject: LaTex Stylefile

	

I am publishing a monograph with John Benjamins in the Linguistics Today
series. The manuscript is written in LaTex and I have therefore opted to
provide a camera-ready copy rather than converting the manuscript to Word
or some other WYSIWYG format. John Benjamins, however, do not provide a
LaTex stylefile nor did web searches turn one up. Before attempting to
create one, I wanted to ask whether someone in the community has already
done this and would be willing to share it.

Many thanks,
Line Mikkelsen
-------------------------------
Line Mikkelsen
University of California, Berkeley
Department of Linguistics
1203 Dwinelle Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-2650
USA

Linguistic Field(s): Not Applicable






-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-16-150