16.261, Disc: Bilingual Education Policy

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Thu Jan 27 03:25:26 UTC 2005


LINGUIST List: Vol-16-261. Wed Jan 26 2005. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 16.261, Disc: Bilingual Education Policy

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org)
        Sheila Collberg, U of Arizona
        Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox at linguistlist.org>
================================================================

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.


===========================Directory==============================

1)
Date: 20-Jan-2005
From: Henk Wolf < hwolf at fa.knaw.nl >
Subject: Bilingual Education Policy

	
-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:21:52
From: Henk Wolf < hwolf at fa.knaw.nl >
Subject: Bilingual Education Policy


Dear linguists,

Bilingual education has not been a controversial subject in Frisian
politics for years. Although bilingual primary education was prescribed by
law, the educational goals for the minority language Frisian were reached
by only 30% of all primary schools. In its 1999 evaluation report, the
school inspection criticized the general lack of enthusiasm among school
boards to teach Frisian. The also concluded that the teaching methods were
often inadequate and time spent on teaching Frisian was very limited (on
average 25 minutes per week).

This situation was criticized by both the Dutch Ministry for Internal
Affairs and the Council of Europe, who regularly evaluate Frisian language
politics as laid down in the European Charter for Regional and Minority
Languages and several national agreements. No measures were undertaken,
however, to improve Frisian education. Recently, the debate on bilingual
education was reopened by the Frisian provincial government (Deputearre
Steaten), who declared in their report 'Herziening kerndoelen Fries in het
primair onderwijs' (revision of educational goals for Frisian in primary
education) that they no longer considered a policy of equivalent
bilingualism realistic. The provincial government now proposes to lower the
education goals, which still prescribe a level of full literacy. In their
proposal, only 'a positive attitude towards Frisian' would remain as an
obligatory goal. The government advises to leave it to every school which
extra goals they wish to attain for their pupils.

I have read the report, as have other sociolinguists, and we are surprised
to see that no reference at all is made to research on bilingualism or
experiences of bilingual school elsewhere in the world. The official policy
of full equivalence of both official languages is abandoned without a
proper motivation. I invite you all to study the report and the criticism
given. Most of the information is available at http://www.temal.tk
the site of a pressure group that protest against the plans. The information
is mainly in Dutch and Frisian.


Linguistic Field(s): Sociolinguistics

Subject Language(s): Frisian, Western (FRI)
                     Frisian, Northern (FRR)
                     Frisian, Eastern (FRS)





-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-16-261	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list