18.2810, Diss: Historical Ling: Wenger: 'Lotos, Hand und zweimal Mond'

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List: Vol-18-2810. Thu Sep 27 2007. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 18.2810, Diss: Historical Ling: Wenger: 'Lotos, Hand und zweimal Mond'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Luiza Newlin Lukowicz <luiza at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 27-Sep-2007
From: Barbara Wenger < wenger at uni-mainz.de >
Subject: Lotos, Hand und zweimal Mond

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:30:34
From: Barbara Wenger [wenger at uni-mainz.de]
Subject: Lotos, Hand und zweimal Mond
E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=18-2810.html&submissionid=157483&topicid=14&msgnumber=1  


Institution: Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz 
Program: Institut für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2002 

Author: Barbara Wenger

Dissertation Title: Lotos, Hand und zweimal Mond 

Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics

Language Family(ies): Afroasiatic


Dissertation Director(s):
Paul P. De Wolf
Stig Eliasson

Dissertation Abstract:

Cardinal numerals, especially the lower ones, are often considered
linguistically stable and seldom subject to loan processes. So they seem to
offer a perfect basis for studying genetical relations between different
languages.

On a broad scale, this study synchronically and diachronically deals with
the question if and how far this postulation can be maintained with respect
to Afroasiatic languages, i.e. the languages of the Egyptian, Semitic,
Berber (including Guanche), Cushitic and Omotic branch.

Not only the numerals themselves, but also their syntax and numeral systems
are taken into consideration. The study covers approximately 100 languages
and dialects.

To give the reader the opportunity to judge for himself, all sources are
first quoted in their original transcriptions with the author's
explanations; afterwards they are standardized to simplify the comparison.
In the diachronic approach, sometimes two or more sources for one language
are considered to cover an extensive time span in documentation. Wherever
possible, reconstructions are offered, preferably at different historical
stages.

The results of the study show that the above mentioned theory is only
partially valid for those Afroasiatic languages. In fact, especially the
lower numerals are exposed to changes, either through borrowing or through
internal substitution. Often the reasons for these changes are determined
more by cultural than by linguistic influences; in those cases, the reasons
are discussed as well. 





-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-2810