18.2811, Qs: Word Order Variation of Whole-part Relation

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List: Vol-18-2811. Thu Sep 27 2007. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 18.2811, Qs: Word Order Variation of Whole-part Relation

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <dan at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 26-Sep-2007
From: Bingfu Lu < lubingfu at yahoo.com >
Subject: Word Order Variation of Whole-part Relation

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:45:13
From: Bingfu Lu [lubingfu at yahoo.com]
Subject: Word Order Variation of Whole-part Relation
E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=18-2811.html&submissionid=157421&topicid=8&msgnumber=1  


I am interested in the following cross-linguistic word order variation
pattern, which can be exemplified with the language internal variation as
follows.

(1)
a.He died at home in bed.
b. He died in bed at home.

(2)
a. *?In bed, at home he died  
b. ?At home, in bed, he died. 

(3)
a. At home, he died in bed.
b. *In bed, he died at home

What the paradigm hints is as follows:

When two location or time expressions having the whole-part relation
co-occur, if both follow the verb, both orders are almost equally likely,
as shown in (1).

If both precede the verb, the whole-part order is overwhelmingly dominant
over the opposite, as shown in (2).

If  the two appears on the two sides of the verb.  Only the whole-part
order is possible, as shown in (3).

I am looking for cross-linguistic data either supporting or denying the
above observation.

If feedback is enough, I will do a summary.

Bingfu Lu
Institute of Linguistics
Shanghai Normal University 

Linguistic Field(s): Typology





-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-2811