24.9, Calls: General Linguistics/Germany

linguist at linguistlist.org linguist at linguistlist.org
Mon Jan 7 17:49:55 UTC 2013

LINGUIST List: Vol-24-9. Mon Jan 07 2013. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 24.9, Calls: General Linguistics/Germany

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Veronika Drake, U of Wisconsin Madison
Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin Madison
Rajiv Rao, U of Wisconsin Madison
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin Madison
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin Madison
       <reviews at linguistlist.org>

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Do you want to donate to LINGUIST without spending an extra penny? Bookmark
the Amazon link for your country below; then use it whenever you buy from

USA: http://www.amazon.com/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-20
Britain: http://www.amazon.co.uk/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-21
Germany: http://www.amazon.de/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistd-21
Japan: http://www.amazon.co.jp/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-22
Canada: http://www.amazon.ca/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistc-20
France: http://www.amazon.fr/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistf-21

For more information on the LINGUIST Amazon store please visit our
FAQ at http://linguistlist.org/amazon-faq.cfm.

Editor for this issue: Alison Zaharee <alison at linguistlist.org>

Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated
from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:

Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:48:53
From: Barbara Sonnenhauser [basonne at lmu.de]
Subject: Distance in Language, Language of Distance

E-mail this message to a friend:
Full Title: Distance in Language, Language of Distance 

Date: 05-Apr-2013 - 06-Apr-2013
Location: Munich, Germany 
Contact Person: Barbara Sonnenhauser
Meeting Email: basonne at lmu.de
Web Site: http://www.slavistik.uni-muenchen.de/aktuelles/termine/conference/index.html 

Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics 

Call Deadline: 18-Jan-2013 

Meeting Description:

In linguistics, the notion of ‘distance’ has already been employed in cognitive and functional approaches, and has proven as a fruitful tool for the description of verbal and nominal categories, particularly in the area of Balkan linguistics. 

However, its use is by no means consistent. On the one hand various linguistic phenomena are described in terms of ‘distance’; on the other hand, the notion itself is being related to different concepts. In its original sense, ‘distance’ refers to a ‘gap’ between two spatially separated points (Dancyngier & Vandelanotte 2009). This spatial concept, combined with a deictic component, is transferred to other mental and linguistic concepts, whereby the speaker serves as a point of reference.

The central question of the conference is: What is the common denominator for the various uses of this notion, based on which a semantic category ‘distance’ can be defined and how is this category realised in language?

Fleischman (1989) notes that the concept of temporal distance expressed by past preterite forms acts as a cross-linguistic ‘metaphorical template’: proximity is associated with actuality/reality, distance with non-actuality/non-reality.

Topolińska (2009) regards evidentiality and admirativity in Macedonian as semantic variants of a hyper-category ‘distance’, which is based on ‘suspended factivity’. This applies to utterances, the factivity of which is neither explicitly confirmed nor denied by the speaker. 

Fielder (1995, 1996) postulates ‘distance’ as a hyper-category for tense, evidentiality and taxis in Bulgarian: tense expresses distance between the narrated event and the speech situation, evidentiality between the narrated event and the narrator, taxis between the narrated event and another event. Fielder (1996) further distinguishes between quantitative distance, represented by tense and taxis, and qualitative distance represented by evidentiality. 

Moreover, a distinction can be made between objective and subjective distance. Objective distance refers to linguistic means expressing the ‘not here and now’. Subjective distance concerns the attitude of the speaker and relates to her/his conscious distancing from the information conveyed.

As regards the establishing of a semantic category ‘distance’, several questions have to be dealt with, for instance:

- Which semantic aspects underlie the concept of ‘distance’? 
- What are the cognitive and linguistic mechanisms involved in transferring the spatial-temporal concept of ‘distance’ on a more abstract level? 
- Which linguistic means serve the encoding of the various types of ‘distance’ and how are they distinguished in discourse? 
- What are the discourse-pragmatic functions of ‘distance’? 
- What are the functions of self-distancing by the speaker?

Possible topics are concerned with - but not restricted to - the above mentioned questions on the category of ‘distance’ in Balkan and other languages. 

Plenary Speakers:

Grace E. Fielder (University of Arizona)
Lieven Vandelanotte (University of Namur): ‘The Language of Distance in Grammar and Discourse’ 

2nd Call for Papers:

We invite submissions of anonymous abstracts for 30 minute talks including discussion.

Submissions should not exceed one page, Times New Roman 12pt. single spaced, with an optional additional page for examples and references. Either PDF or Word format is accepted.

Please send your abstracts to Barbara Sonnenhauser (basonne at lmu.de).

Important Dates:

Extended deadline: 18 January 2013
Notification: 25 January 2013
Conference: 5-6 April 2013

Conference site: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Institute of Slavic Philology (Munich / Germany)

LINGUIST List: Vol-24-9	
Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated
from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:

More information about the Linguist mailing list