26.2160, Calls: General Linguistics, Historical Linguistics, Morphology, Syntax/UK

The LINGUIST List via LINGUIST linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Thu Apr 23 04:02:40 UTC 2015

LINGUIST List: Vol-26-2160. Thu Apr 23 2015. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 26.2160, Calls: General Linguistics, Historical Linguistics, Morphology, Syntax/UK

Moderators: linguist at linguistlist.org (Damir Cavar, Malgorzata E. Cavar)
Reviews: reviews at linguistlist.org (Anthony Aristar, Helen Aristar-Dry, Sara Couture)
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

*************    LINGUIST List 2015 Fund Drive    *************
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:


Editor for this issue: Erin Arnold <earnold at linguistlist.org>

Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:02:36
From: Tim Feist [t.feist at surrey.ac.uk]
Subject: Gender and Classifiers: Diachronic and Synchronic Variation

Full Title: Gender and Classifiers: Diachronic and Synchronic Variation 

Date: 28-Jan-2016 - 29-Jan-2016
Location: University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom 
Contact Person: Tim Feist
Meeting Email: t.feist at surrey.ac.uk

Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics; Historical Linguistics; Morphology; Syntax 

Call Deadline: 15-Oct-2015 

Meeting Description:

Following two previous workshops – 'Gender and Classifiers: Cross-linguistic perspectives' in 2014 and 'Gender and Classifiers: Areal and genealogical perspectives' in 2015 – for our third workshop we want to take a closer look at gender and classifiers from the perspective of both diachronic and synchronic variation.

Gender and classifiers are usually thought of as two distinct, yet mutually exclusive, systems of noun categorisation. In a gender system, as for example in Italian or German, nouns are assigned one or more genders on a semantic or formal basis, and the genders of the language can be defined by sets of markers on agreement targets. In a classifier system, as we find it in Chinese or Vietnamese for instance, a noun appears with a semantically compatible classifier in certain contexts, e.g. quantification with a numeral. But recent research has turned up more and more languages (mostly Papuan, South American, and Australian) in which the two co-occur, yielding overlapping and interacting systems of classification.

The role that diachronic and synchronic variation play in languages which exhibit both systems is an exciting and new area of enquiry which promises to expand our understanding of the relation between the two systems, particularly in light of the fact that they are often involved in processes of grammaticalisation (e.g. gender systems which develop from classifier systems).

This workshop is part of the research project “Combining Gender and Classifiers in Natural Language” funded by the AHRC (UK).

Date: 28–29 January 2016
Venue: University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
Organized by the Surrey Morphology Group

Invited Speaker:

Professor Maria Polinsky (University of Maryland)

Language Tutorial:

As a special part of this workshop, Professor Gunter Senft (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen) has kindly agreed to give a language tutorial on the system of classifiers in Kilivila, the Austronesian language of the Trobriand Islanders of Papua New Guinea.

Call for Papers:

The main questions guiding this workshop are:

(i) Are languages with both gender and classifiers more susceptible to
synchronic variation than languages with only one system?
(ii) What can variation tell us about the interaction between the two systems?
(ii) How do dual-systems of categorisation arise and what is the historical
relation between their constituent parts?

While we shall favour abstracts that address these issues directly, we will
also consider abstracts that address more general issues of gender and

People wishing to present a paper at the workshop are invited to submit a
one-page anonymous abstract in electronic form (PDF or Word document) to Tim
Feist at the following address: t.feist at surrey.ac.uk.

LINGUIST List: Vol-26-2160	
Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated
from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:

More information about the LINGUIST mailing list