30.3849, Calls: Pragmatics, Psycholinguistics, Semantics/Italy

Sat Oct 12 03:55:56 UTC 2019

LINGUIST List: Vol-30-3849. Fri Oct 11 2019. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 30.3849, Calls: Pragmatics, Psycholinguistics, Semantics/Italy

Moderator: Malgorzata E. Cavar (linguist at linguistlist.org)
Student Moderator: Jeremy Coburn
Managing Editor: Becca Morris
Team: Helen Aristar-Dry, Everett Green, Sarah Robinson, Peace Han, Nils Hjortnaes, Yiwen Zhang, Julian Dietrich
Jobs: jobs at linguistlist.org | Conferences: callconf at linguistlist.org | Pubs: pubs at linguistlist.org

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
           https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

Editor for this issue: Everett Green <everett at linguistlist.org>
================================================================

Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 23:55:05
From: Ilaria Frana [ilaria.frana at unikore.it]
Subject: Modal Inferences - an XPrag Workshop

Full Title: Modal Inferences - an XPrag Workshop 

Date: 03-Jun-2020 - 05-Jun-2020
Location: Siracusa, Italy 
Contact Person: Ilaria Frana
Meeting Email: ilaria.frana at unikore.it
Web Site: https://www.xprag.de/?page_id=8014 

Linguistic Field(s): Pragmatics; Psycholinguistics; Semantics 

Call Deadline: 15-Feb-2020 

Meeting Description:

The goal of the workshop is to bring together theoretical and experimental
researchers in Linguistics, Psychology and Philosophy, working on deepening
our understanding of modal inferences (inferences about the epistemic state of
the speaker or the addressee) and how they arise in natural languages. We
welcome submissions articulating empirical and theoretical issues, including
but not limited to the following areas.

Ignorance:

A variety of constructions have been associated with ignorance inferences
about the speaker. Prominent among these are disjunctive statements like (i)
suggesting that the speaker is ignorant as to whether Salvo is in Palermo and
as to whether he is in Catania.

(i) Salvo is in Palermo or Catania.

Ignorance inferences like the above have been analysed as an implicature,
arising either from pragmatic reasoning on the part of the hearer (Gazdar
1979, Sauerland 2004, Fox 2007, Pistoia-Reda 2014), or from more grammatical
means (Meyer 2013, Buccola and Haida 2019, Fox 2017). Similar ignorance
inferences have been observed in connection with modified numerals (see e.g.
Nouwen 2010) and so-called modal indefinites (Kratzer & Shimoyama 2002,
Chierchia 2006, Alonso-Ovalle and Menendez-Benito 2009, a.o.).
In recent years, the processing and acquisition profiles of ignorance
inferences (Hochstein et al 2014, Dieuleveut et al 2019), as well as their
interactions with presuppositions and other inferences (Gajewski and Sharvit
2009, Spector and Sudo 2017, Anvari 2018, Marty 2017), have been more and more
at the centre of attention in this literature.

Bias and Evidence:

Another line of work investigating modal inferences focuses on
speaker/hearer's epistemic biases in polar questions (Ladd 1981, Büring &
Gunlogson 2000; Romero & Han 2004; Krifka 2017; Domaneschi et. al. 2017,
a.o.). For instance, the English negative polar question in (ii) mandatorily
conveys that the speaker had a prior bias for the positive answer to the
question and is posing the question with the intent of double-checking that
bias in the face of counter-evidence (here provided by Salvo's assertion) and,
at the same time, challenge the addressee's attempt to add the content of his
assertion to the common ground. Recent work has shown that epistemic biases in
polar questions may interact with other perspectivally centered elements, like
evidentials or discourse particles (see for e.g. Bhadra 2016; Frana & Rawlins
2016; Frana & Menendez Benito 2019). In the domain of assertions, epistemic
adverbs like really, Verum focus, discourse particles, focused negation in
denials, have also been shown to trigger inferences on the epistemic state of
the speaker with respect to the common ground (Gutzmann & Castroviejo Miró
2011; Repp 2013; Romero 2014, among many others).

(ii) Salvo: I have never been to the South of Italy.
Caterina: Didn't you go to Sicily last year?

For each of the above areas, a number of questions remain open, including:

What is the status of these inferences, i.e., are they implicatures,
presuppositions, or some other type of not-at-issue content? How do they
arise?
What are the properties of the constructions and sentences associated with
those inferences?
Can the inference-trigger occur in embedded contexts, and if so, what are the
related constraints?
How do epistemic inferences interact with each other and other types of
inferences?
What is the processing profile of those inferences and how are they acquired?

Parallel questions can be asked about epistemic inferences arising from
evidentials, discourse particles, miratives, predicates of personal taste and
related phenomena.

Call for Papers:

On June 3rd-5th, 2020 the workshop “Modal Inferences” will be hosted by the
University of Enna ''Kore'' in Siracusa, Sicily, Italy. 

The workshop is organized by Ilaria Frana (University of Enna),
Marie-Christine Meyer (ZAS Berlin), Salvatore Pistoia-Reda (ZAS Berlin/Siena),
Jacopo Romoli (Ulster University), and Uli Sauerland (ZAS Berlin).

The goal of the workshop is to bring together theoretical and experimental
researchers in Linguistics, Psychology and Philosophy, working on deepening
our understanding of modal inferences (e.g. inferences about the epistemic
state of the speaker or the addressee) and how they arise in natural
languages. We welcome submissions articulating empirical and theoretical
issues on topics including but not limited to ignorance inferences arising
from disjunctions, modified numerals and related constructions,
speaker/hearer's epistemic biases in polar questions, epistemic inferences
arising from the future tense, evidentials, indefinites, discourse particles,
miratives, and predicates of personal taste (full workshop description can be
found here). 

We welcome abstracts for 30 minutes talks (20 + 10 discussion) which address
issues relevant to the workshop’s theme. Abstracts should be no longer than 2
A4 pages, with a 12 pt font and 2.5 cm/1 inch margins. The abstracts must be
anonymous and not identify the authors. Authors may submit at most two
abstracts, at most one of which may be single-authored. Please submit via
Easychair by 15 February 2020 at the latest. 

Link for online submission: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=mod19

Invited Speakers:

- Emmanuel Chemla (ENS) 
- Lisa Matthewson (University of British Columbia) 
- Clemens Mayr (Georg-August Universität Göttingen)
- Maribel Romero (Universität Konstanz)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************    LINGUIST List Support    ***************************
 The 2019 Fund Drive is under way! Please visit https://funddrive.linguistlist.org
  to find out how to donate and check how your university, country or discipline
     ranks in the fund drive challenges. Or go directly to the donation site:
               https://iufoundation.fundly.com/the-linguist-list-2019

                        Let's make this a short fund drive!
                Please feel free to share the link to our campaign:
                    https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-30-3849	
----------------------------------------------------------