LL-L "Orthography" 2002.04.09 (09) [E]

Lowlands-L sassisch at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 9 23:02:59 UTC 2002


======================================================================
 L O W L A N D S - L * 09.APR.2002 (09) * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
 Web Site: <http://www.geocities.com/sassisch/rhahn/lowlands/>
 Rules: <http://www.geocities.com/sassisch/rhahn/lowlands/rules.html>
 Posting Address: <lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org>
 Server Manual: <http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html>
 Archive: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html>
=======================================================================
 A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian L=Limburgish
 LS=Low Saxon (Low German) S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic Z=Zeelandic (Zeeuws)
=======================================================================

From: Sandy Fleming [sandy at scotstext.org]
Subject: "Orthography"

> From: R. F. Hahn <sassisch at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Orthography
>
> There is, of course, also the verb 'to bus', which creates the problems
> "'busses' or 'buses'?" and "'bussed' or 'bused'?"

I think the real problem here is that the spelling "bus" is
irregular - it's a shortened form of the Latin construction
"omnibus" ("for all"), and the regular English spelling rule
has been ignored. In regular English spellings the rule is
that in a word ending in /s/ (other than when the /s/ is a
morpheme - plural or verb endings) the /s/ should be spelt
<ss> after a lax vowel or <se> after a tense vowel, eg:

lax vowel - hiss miss muss guess less loss pass &c
tense vowel - house mouse &c

So "bus" is an irregular spelling which would be regularized
as "buss", and this may explain the tendency to prefer the
<ss> with lesser-known meanings, and certainly does explain
why "buss-" works better morphologically.

Of course there's also tease, please &c where the <se> is
pronounced /z/, but it's possible to discover rules governing
this, and in fact <ce> seems more usual than <se> (peace, face
&c), presumably for latinate spellings?  Yes, English spelling
is really quite regular if you can deal with hundreds or
thousands of rules!

Sandy
http://scotstext.org
A dinna dout him, for he says that he
On nae accoont wad ever tell a lee.
                          - C.W.Wade,
                    'The Adventures o McNab'

==================================END===================================
 You have received this because your account has been subscribed upon
 request. To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l"
 as message text from the same account to
 <listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org> or sign off at
 <http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html>.
=======================================================================
 * Please submit postings to <lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org>.
 * Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
 * Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
 * Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
   to be sent to <listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org> or at
   <http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html>.
 * Please use only Plain Text format, not Rich Text (HTML) or any other
   type of format, in your submissions
=======================================================================



More information about the LOWLANDS-L mailing list