LL-L "Lexicon" 2004.01.22 (08) [E]

Lowlands-L lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Thu Jan 22 23:38:27 UTC 2004


======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * 22.JAN.2004 (08) * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/index.php?page=rules
Posting Address: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
=======================================================================
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West)Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeêuws)
=======================================================================

From: Sandy Fleming [sandy at scotstext.org]
Subject: "Lexicon"

> From: fvanlamoen at planet.nl <fvanlamoen at planet.nl>
> Subject: LL-L "Lexicon" 2004.01.21 (12) [E]
>
> I believe that Cantor's sentence is taken from his diagonal argument, so
> that the Zahlen are rational numbers, i.e. generally no cardinal numbers.

Sorry, I might have known it was the diagonal argument! I had
assumed he was referring to an infinite set of integers.

> The cofusion may have risen from:
>
> "A lot of people are ... " where probably gramatically more
> correct would be
> "a lot of people is ...".

I don't think it's the same thing - I've worked with software
engineering documentation for a long time and this is the one
grammatical problem that occurs again and again. When asked to
correct it there's often confusion as the writer reads his
sentence over and over again, trying to decide which form of
the verb is right. On the other hand I'd say "a lot of people
is" would be obviously wrong to them. I think it's simply the
proximity of the misapplied noun to the verb which causes the
problem.

Sandy
http://scotstext.org/

================================END===================================
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
  to be sent to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or at
  http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
======================================================================



More information about the LOWLANDS-L mailing list