LL-L "Phonology" 2005.06.06 (07) [E]

Lowlands-L lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Mon Jun 6 19:42:44 UTC 2005


======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * 06.JUN.2005 (07) * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/index.php?page=rules
Posting: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org or lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Commands ("signoff lowlands-l" etc.): listserv at listserv.net
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
=======================================================================
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West)Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeêuws)
=======================================================================

From: Críostóir Ó Ciardha <paada_please at yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: LL-L "Phonology" 2005.06.06 (02) [D/E]


Ingmar wrote:
"What I find interesting about the original question (by whom that was put?)
is that Americans seem to hear Canadian not only as [u:] but also as [y].
What does this [y] mean - is that the same as Dutch , German <ü>, French ?
Would that mean some Americans hear as [@"by:t], that would be very
striking..."

That was originally put by me. Yes, I meant IPA [y].

Go raibh maith agat,

Criostóir.

----------

From: Ed Alexander <edsells at cogeco.ca>
Subject: LL-L "Phonology" 2005.06.06 (02) [D/E]

At 07:36 AM 06/06/05 -0700, Criostóir wrote:

>You don't want us to be interested in Canadian English, Ed?

Ha ha.  It's just that I think must have explained my point of view about
this spelling three or four times over the years, and it always seems to be
such a hard point to make.  Please excuse my expression of my frustration
which was meant to be humorous.

Yew kin always be intrested in our quaint speech, fars I'm concerned.  Why
not, eh?

Ed

==============================END===================================
Please submit postings to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l")
are  to be sent to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or at
http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================



More information about the LOWLANDS-L mailing list