language revival and stabilization (Hebrew, Ukrainian)
Zev bar-Lev
zbarlev at mail.sdsu.edu
Fri Oct 4 19:48:07 UTC 1996
Sorry for not mentioning that the example was (indeed) Hebrew.
As for reviving: Hebrew did have continuous speakers, in particular in
Israel, throughout the ages -- but just as certainly it was a secondary,
very minority language even there until its "rebirth". It had a great
disadvantage in this respect as compared with Ukrainian. Even today, with
Russian immigration to Israel, a huge part of the Israeli citizenry is
non-native-speaking in Hebrew.
But its disadvantage is also an advantage, in that once it took hold, it
arrived fully, and remains in an upward trend -- although threatened on the
specific ("nicvkel and dime) level by international English.
Among suggestions I would have (as also expressed in a thesis just written
on Ukrainian by one of my students) is to beef up courses in the US -- not
the traditional course, leading to grammatical expertise, but rather a
shorter and more popular course, leading to communicative confidence (NB:
confidence) in speaking, for as wide a population as possible -- ethnic
Ukrainians and their spouses and children, and others, amateurs, who just
happen to get interested.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
zev bar-Lev (prof.)
dept. of linguistics & oriental languages,
san diego state university, san diego CA 92182
e-mail ZBARLEV at mail.sdsu.edu
tel. (619)-594-6389
fax: (619)-594-4877
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
More information about the SEELANG
mailing list