[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Hindi and Gujarati discontinuous NPs]]

[Tatiana Oranskaia]

VYAKARAN: South Asian Languages and Linguistics Net
Editors:  Tej K. Bhatia, Syracuse University, New York
          John Peterson, University of Osnabrueck, Germany
Details:  Send email to listserv at listserv.syr.edu and say: INFO VYAKARAN
Subscribe:Send email to listserv at listserv.syr.edu and say:
          SUBSCRIBE VYAKARAN FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME
          (Substitute your real name for first_name last_name)
Archives: http://listserv.syr.edu



-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Betreff: 	Re: [Fwd: Hindi and Gujarati discontinuous NPs]
Datum: 	Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
Von: 	kadambari sinha <kadambari_sinha at yahoo.com>
An: 	Tatiana Oranskaia <tatiana.oranskaia at uni-hamburg.de>



This is what a very well educated native speaker - Mrs. Kadambari Sinha 
- thinks about these sentences:
 
 
Even in a marked construction, all three sentences are absolutely 
inacceptable. I cannot imagine any context in which they could be used.
 

kitaabeN   us-ne  xariidiiN   bahut acchii
books-FEM  he-ERG buy.PST     many.FEM
"He bought many books."

baccoN-ne     kal           kai  yah gaanaa gaayaa    thaa
children-ERG  yesterday     many this song  sing.PERF be.PST
"Many children sang this song yesterday."

bacce     kal      kai  yah   gaanaa gaayeN ge
children  tomorrow many this  song   sing   fut
"Many children will sing this song tomorrow."

 

"Keep in mind that the construction might be quite marked and that it 
probably needs a proper context for being acceptable. If so, just 
imagine any context you like... (Maybe the left peripheral noun should 
be read as a contrastive topic, but it's really up to you.)"


 

----- Original Message ----
From: Tatiana Oranskaia <tatiana.oranskaia at uni-hamburg.de>
To: Ram Prasad Bhatt <Ram.Prasad.Bhatt at uni-hamburg.de>; Sharma Narendra 
Dev <nd-sharma at arcor.de>; kadambari sinha <kadambari_sinha at yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 20:32:53
Subject: [Fwd: Hindi and Gujarati discontinuous NPs]

Liebe Freunde- Hindi-Muttersprachler,

hätten Sie /hättet Ihr Lust haben, die nachstehenden Sätze einzuschätzen?

Herzlich
Tatiana O.


-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Betreff: 	Hindi and Gujarati discontinuous NPs
Datum: 	Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:14:19 +0200
Von: 	Thomas Wiederhold <th.wiederhold at GOOGLEMAIL.COM>
Rückantwort: 	South Asian Linguists <VYAKARAN at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
Firma: 	Uni Potsdam
An: 	VYAKARAN at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU



VYAKARAN: South Asian Languages and Linguistics Net
Editors:  Tej K. Bhatia, Syracuse University, New York
         John Peterson, University of Osnabrueck, Germany
Details:  Send email to listserv at listserv.syr.edu and say: INFO VYAKARAN
Subscribe:Send email to listserv at listserv.syr.edu and say:
         SUBSCRIBE VYAKARAN FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME
         (Substitute your real name for first_name last_name)
Archives: http://listserv.syr.edu

Dear all,

I'm preparing a paper on discontinuous NPs (DNP) in some Indian languages.  
I got two sets of data that I would be interested in judgements from  
native speakers. It concerns discontinuous NPs in Hindi and Gujarati, I  
got conflicting judgements from different people, but unfortunately some  
of them were not-quite-native speakers. Still, even between native  
speakers there seems to be some variation. I just would like to know how  
widespread this variation is...

Here's the set of Hindi sentences I need more judgements for. 
kitaabeN   us-ne  xariidiiN   bahut acchii
books-FEM  he-ERG buy.PST     many.FEM
"He bought many books."

baccoN-ne     kal           kai  yah gaanaa gaayaa    thaa
children-ERG  yesterday     many this song  sing.PERF be.PST
"Many children sang this song yesterday."

bacce     kal      kai  yah   gaanaa gaayeN ge
children  tomorrow many this  song   sing   fut
"Many children will sing this song tomorrow."


For Gujarati native speakers I got the following questions. Of course  
similar considerations regarding proper contexts apply:

These are the two "reference sentences", these should be grammatical:

peter-e   nannu bacchu joyu.
Peter-ERG small child  saw.N
"Peter saw small children."

peter-e   nanna     baccha-ne joyu.
Peter-ERG small.OBL child-ACC saw.N
"Peter saw (the) small children."

Some ellipses:

peter-e   joyu  nanna-ne.
Peter-ERG saw.N small.OBL-ACC
"Peter saw (the) small one."

peter-e   joyu  nanna.
Peter-ERG saw.N small.OBL

peter-e   joyu  nannu-ne.
Peter-ERG saw.N small-ACC

peter-e   joyu  nannu.
Peter-ERG saw.N small

And now finally some DNPs:

baccha-ne peter-e   joyu  nanna.
child-ACC Peter-ERG saw.N small.OBL
"Peter saw (the) small children."

baccha-ne peter-e   joyu  nannu.
child-ACC Peter-ERG saw.N small

bacchu peter-e   joyu  nannu.
child  Peter-ERG saw.N small

bacchu peter-e   joyu  nanna.
child  Peter-ERG saw.N small.OBL



If you know anyone who could be of assistence and isn't on this list, it  
would be great if you could forward this email.
Thanks a lot for your help.

-- 
Thomas Wiederhold
DFG-Project FA 255/5 (=Morphosyntax and Phonology of split NPs and PPs)
Linguistics Department
Potsdam University





Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk..messenger.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/vyakaran/attachments/20080430/a5da23c0/attachment.htm>