That/Which
James Smith
jsmithjamessmith at YAHOO.COM
Fri Jul 28 14:57:05 UTC 2000
Both my Gregg stylebook and my very old college
writer's guide say in so many words that it is more
common or prefered to use a comma followed by "which"
to introduce a nonrestrictive or nonessential clause
and "that" - with no comma - to introduce a
restrictive clause, but the two words are basically
interchangable.
The Gregg stylebook actually gives situations in which
"which" is the preferred pronoun at the beginning of a
restrictive clause, although I personally prefer
"that" in some of the examples they give and
stubbornly persist to use "that" in spite of their
permission, or urging, to use "which".
When I read, it often trips me up to find "which" at
the beginning of an essential clause, and I frequently
must reread the sentence in which such a consruction
occurs to be sure I've understood: whether a clause is
essential or nonessential can completely change the
meaning of a sentence. To me, whether "which" or
"that" introduces a clause is a basic signal as to the
meaning or significance of what follows.
--- AAllan at AOL.COM wrote:
> There is the expected very full historical
> discussion in Merriam-Webster's
> Dictionary of English Usage, s.v. "that." Just one
> little part of it reports
> Virginia McDavid's study in _American Speech_ for
> Spring-Summer 1977, showing
> "that about 75 percent of the instances of _which_
> in edited prose introduce
> restrictive clauses; about 25 percent,
> nonrestrictive ones."
>
> I've had some editors conduct "which hunts" in my
> mss. and have been able to
> point out smugly how many restrictive "which"s
> they've missed because those
> sound so natural. - Allan Metcalf
=====
James D. SMITH |If history teaches anything
SLC, UT |it is that we will be sued
jsmithjamessmith at yahoo.com |whether we act quickly and decisively
|or slowly and cautiously.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list