Infinite vocabulary
Laurence Horn
laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Thu Oct 26 03:34:15 UTC 2000
At 11:04 AM -0400 10/26/00, Alice Faber wrote:
>Paul Frank wrote:
>>
>>Your student is right about the importance of context and the endless supply
>>of expressions for sex. However, though the list may be as infinite as
>>Borges's universal library, some verb-noun pairings would seem to be
>>excluded from it. Saying "I think they're watching the paint dry, dragging
>>their feet, beating around the bush, doing nothing to write home about" may
>>mean lots of things, but not that they're doing it. Though come to think of
>>it, these statements could all mean that the deed is in the offing.
>
>I don't think there's any question about the middle two being capable
>of packing quite a sexual innuendo; the outer two would merely be
>comments on technique.
>
right; note the minimal contrast between "doing nothing to write home
about" and "doing nothing they'd want to write their mothers about".
Another extension of the infinity principle: it came to me when I
was looking through the entries in Pam Munro's UCLA Slang Dictionary
that the class of adjectives (including participial adjectives) that
can appear in the frame
I/He/She was just a leettle bit _____
to convey the meaning 'drunk' or perhaps 'sick to the stomach because
of being drunk' is virtually unbounded. I don't know if the
cardinality of that set (whether or not it's infinite) is greater
than, lesser than, or equivalent to that of the sexual one.
larry
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list