Unsignalized; Mad Cow Disease
James A. Landau
JJJRLandau at AOL.COM
Sun Apr 1 14:27:54 UTC 2001
In a message dated 03/31/2001 11:36:37 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
Ittaob at AOL.COM writes:
> Rather than "unsignalized" or even "unsignaled", wouldn't "no traffic lights
> at crossings, next 3 miles" convey the thought much more clearly and
> succinctly?
Yes, I think you are right. However, since traffic signs are designed for
easy AND quick comprehension by a driver who should be keeping his eyes on
the road, the sign should probably read
NO LIGHTS AT XINGS
NEXT 3 MILES
Also, one I left out of my original posting. In New Brunswick, on College
Avenue (which is correctly named; it runs through the College Avenue campus
of Rutgers University), there is a sign reading
RANDOM PED XINGS
(meaning that pedestrians are likely to be crossing the street other than at
marked crosswalks).
- Jim Landau
P.S. I once read about a highway department which was wondering whether
people actually read highway signs, so they allegedly posted a sign reading
PASS WITH CAR
and apparently nobody noticed.
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list