ASSist TO, HELP TO, etc.
Peter A. McGraw
pmcgraw at LINFIELD.EDU
Tue Feb 5 18:13:50 UTC 2002
My original post, which started this thread, didn't address the presence or
absence of "to" to link "help" or "have" with the infinitive of another
verb. The apparent innovation I was calling attention to was the extension
of the "to-less" pattern beyond a very small closed list of verbs
(including have, let, help, make), viz.:
"Here's a conversational gambit: Seems to me that there are fewer potential
funders now than a few years ago for programs that assist first-generation
college aspirants prepare for and succeed in post-secondary education."
My own internal grammar allows only that very small list to be linked
directly, modal-fashion, to a following infinitive without a linking "to".
So for me, "help...to prepare" and "help...prepare" are both perfectly
grammatical. I guess I'd call "assist...to prepare" marginal, with
"assist...in preparing" much more natural. *"Assist...prepare," however,
is impossible.
Peter Mc.
--On Monday, February 4, 2002 1:55 PM +0000 RonButters at AOL.COM wrote:
> Using questionnaire methodology, we sampled a fairly large number of
> Duke students from various parts of the country and documented the fact
> that HELP TO and HELP are used almost interchangeably by most Americans.
> We did not sample ASSIST (TO), but I would guess that a lot of people
> would accept it because of the close semantic relationship with HELP.
>
> I imagine that one could do a Nexis search that would yield interesting
> data for all three --HAVE (TO), HELP (TO), and ASSIST (TO).
****************************************************************************
Peter A. McGraw
Linfield College * McMinnville, OR
pmcgraw at linfield.edu
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list