RE: Re: RE: Re: ? ? ? Re: whence BUCK NAKED?
Baker, John
JMB at STRADLEY.COM
Mon Apr 5 22:07:30 UTC 2004
O.K., the Associated Press used "butt naked" in a 1/10/85 story. That still leaves a bit of a gap.
John Baker
-----Original Message-----
From: American Dialect Society [mailto:ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]On Behalf
Of RonButters at AOL.COM
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 6:01 PM
To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: RE: Re: ? ? ? Re: whence BUCK NAKED?
In a message dated 4/5/04 5:57:28 PM, JMB at STRADLEY.COM writes:
> Maybe, but there were a number of years before 1990 during which
> "butt naked" could be said and written with impunity. A derivation of "buck
> naked" from "butt naked" requires the assumption that "butt naked" came first,
> was almost entirely superseded by "buck naked," then began a come-back around
> 1990. At present, this theory is entirely lacking in evidence.
>
> John Baker
>
Well, Google would not be a very good source, would it?
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list