aw-right
Arnold M. Zwicky
zwicky at CSLI.STANFORD.EDU
Tue Jun 14 16:09:30 UTC 2005
On Jun 14, 2005, at 7:46 AM, Larry Horn wrote:
> At 6:36 AM -0700 6/14/05, James Smith wrote:
>
>> Anyway, the word is "awright".
>
> and only when it *is* a word. So,
>
> "The kids are all right/alright/ = awright" (= 'they're fine, no
> prob')
> "The kids are all right/*alright/*= awright" (= 'none of them are
> wrong')
>
> Which supports the utility of the non-standard but popular "alright"
> spelling indicating wordhood, especially given the parallel to:
>
> "The kids are {already/*all ready} gone" [for me, opt. = "awready"]
> "The kids are {all ready/*already} to go" [for me, =/= "awready"]
just to hammer home a point here: this particular l-vocalization
occurs in the speech of people who are not generally l-vocalizers --
people like larry and me.
a moment of entertainment: i little while back i got an indignant
message from a correspondent incensed at my defense of "trepidatious"
on Language Log some time ago. the header of the message:
I assume you think "alright" is a word, too.
(i've chosen not to respond.)
arnold (zwicky at csli.stanford.edu)
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list