Fwd: Get a deal on prescribed relief. Outstanding.

[Laurence Horn]

>undernegation?

Tht would be my diagnosis--a simple typo, with the "not" missing
before "shelling out".  (Or, perhaps, such a negation was in the
original and was then zapped by a copy-editor who objected to the
split infinitive in "to not shelling out...")

Larry

>
>Begin forwarded message:
>
>>From: Elizabeth Zwicky <zwicky at greatcircle.com>
>>Date: November 15, 2005 9:28:32 AM PST
>>To: "Arnold M.Zwicky" <zwicky at csli.stanford.edu>
>>Subject: Fwd: Get a deal on prescribed relief. Outstanding.
>>
>>I accidentally read the first sentence of this spam, and now am
>>wondering how they got to it; do they not understand "ticket to"?
>>Or is "uneconomical" the problem?
>>
>>Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>>From: "hank cardenas" <harmonia at whaaatsup.net>
>>>Date: November 14, 2005 8:49:03 PM PST
>>>To: "pat tegarden" <zwicky at greatcircle.com>
>>>Subject: Get a deal on prescribed relief. Outstanding.
>>>Reply-To: "hank cardenas" <harmonia at whaaatsup.net>
>>>
>>>Our shop is the clear ticket to shelling out uneconomical prices
>>>for the same goods.
>
>>>Owing to our air tight service, we're the most relied on shopping
>>>site on the internet...