The Dirty Word in 43 Down
Laurence Horn
laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Fri Apr 7 19:29:41 UTC 2006
At 12:02 PM -0400 4/7/06, RonButters at AOL.COM wrote:
>After all, condoms are pretty useful devices. Would CONDOM itself be
>objectionable in a crossword?
Only if the clue is "male contraceptive device". It would be OK if
the clue is "product responsible for promotion of immorality" or
possibly "putative preventative against STDs".
LH
>In a message dated 4/7/06 11:05:28 AM, dave at WILTON.NET writes:
>
>
>> Clearly the condom sense is the root cause of the objectionability, but I'm
>> not sure that people automatically think of a condom when they hear the
>> word. "Scumbag" is a nastier epithet than "slimeball," not because of the
>> etymology but because of the contexts in which they are used.
>>
>> "Scuzzbag", at least to me, is a minced form of "scumbag," and therefore
>> more acceptable.
>>
>> --Dave Wilton
>> dave at wilton.net
>>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list