"Aspirant"/"aspirational"

[Wilson Gray]

"Grotesque"? Again, I follow in your esteemed footsteps, Charlie.

-Wilson

On 8/10/06, Charles Doyle <cdoyle at uga.edu> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       Charles Doyle <cdoyle at UGA.EDU>
> Subject:      "Aspirant"/"aspirational"
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> For the past few years (at least), academic administrators--and faculty members who aspire to emulate, impress, or replace them--have been using the terms "aspirant" and "aspirational" (interchangeably, as far as I can tell) to describe superior institutions of a comparable kind that their own institutions might have some hope, some day, of achieving parity with--in contrast with "peer" institutions, those with which parity is already realized.
>
> That use of the adjectives has always struck me as grotesque: no longer does the hopeful party aspire; rather, the object of the aspiration is now presented as the possesser of that aspiration.
>
> Google hits:  "aspirant schools" 203; "aspirational schools" 65; "aspirant colleges" 69; "aspirational colleges" 7; "aspirant universities" 75; "aspirational uiversities" 163; "aspirant institutions" 542; "aspirational institutions" 442: "peer and aspirant" 297"; "peer and aspirational" 442.
>
> --Charlie
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>


--
Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have
found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be
imposed upon them.

Frederick Douglass

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org