"guy''
Joel S. Berson
Berson at ATT.NET
Fri Jun 15 13:58:11 UTC 2007
At 6/15/2007 08:13 AM, Jon L. wrote:
>"Guy" has been America's slang/colloquial term of choice for male
>human beings for well over a century; so more specific nuances are
>inevitable. (Gays look for "guys." So do "gals." Is that
>linguistically noteworthy? Dunno.)
Is it linguistically noteworthy that it is also being used today to
refer to females, including by females? What date should one look to beat?
Joel
> HDAS lacks a separate definition for vocative "guy" because it
> seemed unnecessary. That may have been a hasty decision.
>
> But the year to beat (shouldn't be difficult) is 1915.
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list