"Like" abuse redivivus

Jonathan Lighter wuxxmupp2000 at YAHOO.COM
Mon Apr 14 13:41:26 UTC 2008


Not that I hear.

  JL

Benjamin Lukoff <blukoff at ALVORD.COM> wrote:
  ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
Sender: American Dialect Society
Poster: Benjamin Lukoff
Subject: Re: "Like" abuse redivivus
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 RonButters at AOL.COM wrote:

> In hindsight, I believe it seemed understandable to me as an
> extention/contraction of "(What) he (said was something like), Q"--which is, after all, what
> it meant (at least then). There were other such quotatives going around then as
> well, at least one of which I reported in the early 1980s in AS: "BE all," as
> in "And he was all, 'Q'."

I once tried conducting an informal survey of my friends as to whether
they saw any difference between "And he was all, 'Q'" and "And he was,
like, 'Q'". I got absolutely nowhere. *Is* there a difference in meaning
here?

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list