Rosa/rowz@
Mark Mandel
thnidu at GMAIL.COM
Mon Apr 21 17:41:56 UTC 2008
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Arnold M. Zwicky
<zwicky at csli.stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> On Apr 20, 2008, at 8:15 PM, Mark Mandel wrote:
> > OK, I stand dialectally corrected. MOST English dialects don't have
> > pure [o] or [e].
>
> but those facts don't bear directly on the choice of a phonemic
> transcription. if separate symbols are used for tense and lax vowels,
> as in IPA, then an indication of an offglide on the tense vowels is
> not needed in a phonemic transcription, even for dialects that have
> offglides; it's a matter of phonetic detail.
True, but Damien's example that confused Joel used <ow> for English
phonemic tense /o/, vs.<O> for English phonemic lax /<turned c>/, so
I thought it worth while to explain what the <w> was doing there.
--
Mark Mandel
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list