"Us ourselves"
Wilson Gray
hwgray at GMAIL.COM
Thu Apr 24 02:48:52 UTC 2008
True, Mark, but we merely said that such forms seem strange, not that
we couldn't understand them.
-Wilson
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Mark Mandel <thnidu at gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster: Mark Mandel <thnidu at GMAIL.COM>
> Subject: Re: "Us ourselves"
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Arnold M. Zwicky
> <zwicky at csli.stanford.edu> wrote:
> > On Apr 22, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Wilson Gray wrote:
> > > From Slashdot:
> > > "[T]hey [PayPal] didn't respond to _us ourselves_ at all. [We had to
> > > hire a lawyer.]"
> > >
> > > I've never seen "us ourselves" before. Indeed, all cases of -self
> > > /-selves in this kind of construction seem rather odd. But, again,
> > > maybe that's just me.
> >
> > yes, i find it odd too. CGEL (p. 1497) gives two functions for NP-
> > modifier emphatic reflexives: emphasis (conveying roughly the same
> > thing as "no other than" and "no less than") and contrast, neither of
> > which seems possible in the example above;
>
> Literally "no other than", though. = "didn't respond to us by
> ourselves / to us on our own", as is made clear by the bracketed "[We
>
> had to hire a lawyer.]"
>
> --
> Mark Mandel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
--
All say, "How hard it is that we have to die"---a strange complaint to
come from the mouths of people who have had to live.
-----
-Sam'l Clemens
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list