LSSU Banished Words list, 2008

[Dennis Preston]

When you find these uses 'problematic' and 'precious,' do they peeve you?

dInIs


>---------------------- Information from the mail header
>-----------------------
>Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>Poster:       "Baker, John" <JMB at STRADLEY.COM>
>Subject:      Re: LSSU Banished Words list, 2008
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         I may have been too broad in my condemnation of "authored."  I
>just did a search for uses of "authored" using Google News, to see how
>it is being used in edited text.  Most uses there fall into one of the
>following categories:
>
>         1.      As a synonym for "wrote" or "written":  "Philip Dick
>authored his sci-fi novel 'Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep.'"  This
>was the sense I was criticizing.
>
>         2.      In contexts where document ownership is implied, but
>"wrote" or "written" likely would be inappropriate.  This seems to come
>up particularly in news reports about legislation (likely a bias
>introduced by using a news database):  "A number of new state laws
>authored by two Silicon Valley state senators will take effect today."
>This also arises where there is institutional authorship:  "The Office
>of Strategic Services authored in late June 1945 one of the first
>position papers to address occupation policy toward minorities."
>
>         3.      In contexts betraying uncertainty as to whether "wrote"
>or "written" would be appropriate:  "Bonanno was famous for his family's
>ties to the Mafia, books he authored about them and time spent in a
>federal prison camp."
>
>         4.      In the broader sense of the term:  "Darren McFadden,
>Arkansas' junior running back, gained 105 yards on 21 carries but never
>authored a breathtaking run."
>
>         5.      To show a parallel with "co-authored":  "The site says
>he has authored or co-authored five books and has a Ph.D. in psychology
>from Emory University."
>
>
>         Only the first of these categories really seems problematic to
>me, although the example with Darren McFadden strikes me as a bit
>precious.
>
>
>John Baker
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: American Dialect Society [mailto:ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf
>Of Dave Wilton
>Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 5:06 PM
>To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
>Subject: Re: LSSU Banished Words list, 2008
>
>I kind of like "authored." In this world of ghostwritten books, it
>serves a useful purpose. To "author" a book is to claim the words as
>one's own, regardless of whether or not one actually wrote them.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: American Dialect Society [mailto:ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf
>Of Baker, John
>Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 9:17 AM
>To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
>Subject: Re: LSSU Banished Words list, 2008
>
>         Once again, we see how effective a list like this can be at
>obtaining publicity.  I think I am not alone in having no other
>knowledge of Lake Superior State University.
>
>         What I find most striking is the presence of several specific
>and useful words on this list.  Webinar, waterboarding, surge (when used
>in reference to the 2007 temporary increase in U.S. forces in Iraq), and
>Black Friday are all needed terms for which there are no equally handy
>alternatives.
>
>         Their complaints on "give back," "emotional," and that old
>stand-by, "decimate," just seem silly, while phrases like "X is the new
>Y" and "under the bus" are fads that will run their course in any case.
>But I am with them on author/authored.
>
>
>John Baker
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org


--
Dennis R. Preston
University Distinguished Professor
Department of English
Morrill Hall 15-C
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI 48864 USA

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org