how is the prefix "ex" really spoken (UNCLASSIFIED)

Fri Apr 30 02:00:14 UTC 2010

The exceptions are actually totally regular--the voicing of Verner's Law is between vowels, and in the 'exceptions' cited there is another (pronounced) consonant following--exTreme, exClaim etc.

Intervocalic voicing is a very frequent process in languages. Phonological processes normally follow quite general principles and the pronunciation of 'x' in English is no 'exception'. For those of us who believe phonological behavior is motivated by physiological and perceptual pressures this is not surprising (see, for example, Nathan, Geoffrey. 2008. Phonology: A cognitive grammar introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins--shameless plug...)

Geoff

Geoffrey S. Nathan
Faculty Liaison, C&IT
and Associate Professor, Linguistics Program
+1 (313) 577-1259 (C&IT)
+1 (313) 577-8621 (English/Linguistics)

----- "Tom Zurinskas" <truespel at HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:

> From: "Tom Zurinskas" <truespel at HOTMAIL.COM>
> To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:30:28 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: how is the prefix "ex" really spoken (UNCLASSIFIED)
>
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       Tom Zurinskas <truespel at HOTMAIL.COM>
> Subject:      Re: how is the prefix "ex" really spoken (UNCLASSIFIED)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> What about "extreme" "expect" extraordinary.  These would be "ks" not
> "gs", no?  But according to "law" should they not be "ks" but "gs"
> because they are followed by a stressed syllable (like ~egzzakt)?
> Lots of exceptions to the "law", no?
>
> Anyway, back to the topic.  I'll be changing the short i for "ex" to
> short e in the truespel conversion database.  That's the way it's done
> in USA as I hear it.  Hope that's agreeable to all.
>
> As Jay Leno says ~egzzaktlee  or ~egzzaklee
>
> Tom Zurinskas, USA - CT20, TN3, NJ33, FL7+
> see truespel.com phonetic spelling
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> > Sender: American Dialect Society
> > Poster: Geoffrey Nathan
> > Subject: Re: how is the prefix "ex" really spoken (UNCLASSIFIED)
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Verner's Law (something anyone who has taken even one introductory
> course in Linguistics usually learns about) deals not with vowels but
> with _consonants_. Although it applied to the change from
> Proto-Indo-European to Germanic, its effects are visible (or it's
> reapplying--your choice) in the examples cited.
> >
> > From Wikipedia:
> >
> > "Verner's law, stated by Karl Verner in 1875, describes a historical
> sound change in the Proto-Germanic language whereby voiceless
> fricatives *f, *þ, *s, *h (including *hʷ ), when immediately following
> an unstressed syllable in the same word, underwent voicing and became
> respectively the fricatives *b, *d, *z, *g (and *gʷ)." (Verner's Law
> entry, 1st Para.)
> >
> >
> >
> > Geoffrey S. Nathan
> > Faculty Liaison, C&IT
> > and Associate Professor, Linguistics Program
> > +1 (313) 577-1259 (C&IT)
> > +1 (313) 577-8621 (English/Linguistics)
> >
> > ----- "Tom Zurinskas" wrote:
> >
> >> From: "Tom Zurinskas"
> >> To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 4:27:56 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
> Eastern
> >> Subject: Re: how is the prefix "ex" really spoken (UNCLASSIFIED)
> >>
> >> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> >> -----------------------
> >> Sender: American Dialect Society
> >> Poster: Tom Zurinskas
> >> Subject: Re: how is the prefix "ex" really spoken (UNCLASSIFIED)
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Looks like we're breaking Verner's Law here in the US. We're not
> >> saying ~igzzam for "exam" and ~igzzakt for "exact". I'm hearing
> >> ~egzzam and ~egzzakt.
> >>
> >> As Jay Leno would say ~egzzaktlee.
> >>
> >> Tom Zurinskas, USA - CT20, TN3, NJ33, FL7+
> >> see truespel.com phonetic spelling
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> >> -----------------------
> >>> Sender: American Dialect Society
> >>> Poster: Geoff Nathan
> >>> Subject: Re: how is the prefix "ex" really spoken (UNCLASSIFIED)
> >>>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> I guess being one of the resident phonologists I'd better jump in
> >> now with some elementary phonology.
> >>>
> >>> The pronunciation of the prefix spelled 'ex-' is determined in
> part
> >> by whether it is stressed. If it is stressed it is pronounced with
> the
> >> lax mid front vowel (as in 'bet'). So 'excellent, exercise,
> execute'.
> >> If unstressed it varies between lax mid (bet) and lax high front
> (as
> >> in 'bit') depending on formal/casual, dialect, and many other
> things.
> >> Since there is no rule for this there can be no standardized
> >> transcription. Hence the varying transcriptions for 'excite,
> excel,
> >> exactly...'
> >>> Note, however, that there is a rule about whether the 'x' is
> >> pronounced /ks/ or /gz/. If the syllable preceding it is stressed
> it's
> >> voiceless (ks) but if the following syllable is stressed it is
> voiced
> >> (gz). The exceptions are those words spelled with -xc- . Hence
> >> 'excite, excel' but 'exact, exam'.
> >>> (Esoteric note for historical linguists--the latter principle is
> >> actually Verner's Law.)
> >>>
> >>> Geoff
> >>>
> >>> Geoffrey S. Nathan
> >>> Faculty Liaison, C&IT
> >>> and Associate Professor, Linguistics Program
> >>> +1 (313) 577-1259 (C&IT)
> >>> +1 (313) 577-8621 (English/Linguistics)
> >>>
> >>> ----- "Tom Zurinskas" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> From: "Tom Zurinskas"
> >>>> To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 7:00:16 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
> >> Eastern
> >>>> Subject: Re: how is the prefix "ex" really spoken (UNCLASSIFIED)
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> >>>> -----------------------
> >>>> Sender: American Dialect Society
> >>>> Poster: Tom Zurinskas
> >>>> Subject: Re: how is the prefix "ex" really spoken (UNCLASSIFIED)
> >>>>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> You can hear 'em at thefreedictionary.com. Click on the flags
> for
> >>>> audio. On second listening I hear the first "e" in excess more
> >> like
> >>>> an ~e (as in "bet") than an ~a. Certainly it's an ~a (as in
> "hat")
> >>>> for "access". Having listened to a bunch of words with "ex"
> >> prefixes
> >>>> I thought the "e" in "excess" seemed different trending toward
> ~a
> >>>> rather than ~e.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Tom Zurinskas, USA - CT20, TN3, NJ33, FL7+
> >>>> see truespel.com phonetic spelling
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> >>>> -----------------------
> >>>>> Sender: American Dialect Society
> >>>>> Poster: "Mullins, Bill AMRDEC"
> >>>>> Subject: Re: how is the prefix "ex" really spoken
> (UNCLASSIFIED)
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ~aks was the pronunciation for both USA and UK for one word,
> >>>> "excess"
> >>>>>> ~akses
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How was "access" pronounced? The same as "excess"?
> >>>>> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> >>>>> Caveats: NONE
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> >>>>
> _________________________________________________________________
> >>>> Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from
> >> your
> >>>> inbox.
> >>>>
> >>
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1
> >>>>
> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from
> your
> >> inbox.
> >>
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> _________________________________________________________________
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your
> inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org