sponsor
victor steinbok
aardvark66 at GMAIL.COM
Thu Jul 22 21:06:25 UTC 2010
Why "intangibly"? Don't we have "state sponsors of terrorism"? Why not
broaden to "sponsors of war"?
VS-)
On 7/22/10, Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster: Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at GMAIL.COM>
> Subject: sponsor
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> App. it means "contribute intangibly to, as by providing impetus,
> justification, etc. ":
>
> 2010 Mary A. Favret _War at a Distance_ (Princeton: P.U.P.) 232: ...the
> attacks of Sepetember 11, 2001. Striving to find an adequate response to
> that violence and the wars it sponsored, Butler arrives at the thought that
> her response must initiate [etc.]....
>
> The author is Associate Professor of English at Indiana University.
>
>
> JL
>
>
> --
> "If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the truth."
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list