shagging & fucking

[ronbutters at AOL.COM]

Well, in their defense, since homosexuality had not yet been invented, they did not realize that they were supposed to stick to just one sex as the outlet for their shagging. They seemed to divide the world of lust into tops and bottoms, not men and women. But then, so does the Bible, e g. In Leviticus.
------Original Message------
From: George Thompson
To: ronbutters at aol.com
Subject: Re: shagging & fucking
Sent: Sep 3, 2010 12:07 AM


I'm afraid so.

Quite improper.

GAT

George A. Thompson
Author of A Documentary History of "The African Theatre", Northwestern Univ. Pr., 1998, but nothing much lately.

----- Original Message -----
From: Ronald Butters <ronbutters at aol.com>
Date: Thursday, September 2, 2010 9:55 pm
Subject: Re: shagging & fucking
To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

> I'm condfused about this. Does this mean that the speaker occasionally
> did men as well as women?
> On Sep 1, 2010, at 10:05 PM, George Thompson wrote:
>
> > as for myself I stick as close to Radicati's Arse as a Bum Bailiff
> to Lord Deloraine'
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org