N-word - def. not covered
Wilson Gray
hwgray at GMAIL.COM
Fri Dec 2 05:50:22 UTC 2011
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> grouped with "Blacks" in North America.
"Black in Latin America," by Henry Louis Gates, Jr., suggests that
mulattoes are grouped with blacks *everywhere*. By whites. If a person
is non-white, then the degree of his non-whiteness is of no particular
interest to whites *anywhere*.
Has anyone, anywhere, of whatever racial background, hailed the first
mulatto President of the United States? A difference that makes no
difference is no difference.
Money and fame may come together to bleach a random individual into a
kind of pseudo-white status, even here in The World. But that's pretty
much as far as it goes.
BTW, "it's an ill wind that blows no good," to coin a phrase. As
someone else pointed out in the very forum, several years ago, if it
was possible for a person of known, admitted, or claimed sub-Saharan
African ancestry to have any real social status other than "black,"
the socio-political structure of this country would be unknowably
different and, most likely, disastrous for the non-white of African
ancestry. They'd be totally without any genuine political power.
"Divide et impera," to coin a phrase.
--
-Wilson
-----
All say, "How hard it is that we have to die!"---a strange complaint
to come from the mouths of people who have had to live.
-Mark Twain
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list