status quo = 'situation'
Dan Goncharoff
thegonch at GMAIL.COM
Fri Mar 18 15:23:14 UTC 2011
How about a contrast to either side winning?
DanG
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Jonathan Lighter
<wuxxmupp2000 at gmail.com>wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster: Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at GMAIL.COM>
> Subject: status quo = 'situation'
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Or maybe 'long-term situation.' Truly, who can say?:
>
> 2011 Reuters http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110318/bs_nm/us_markets_oil(March
> 18): "We may be facing the possibility of an entrenched status quo between
> pro and anti Gaddafi groups," said Harry Tchilinguirian, analyst at BNP
> Paribas.
>
> Though OED defines "status quo" as "the existing state of affairs," it
> usually implies a contrast of that state with a different one.
> In the ex. above, there's no contrast that I can see.
>
> JL
>
> --
> "If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the truth."
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list