fodder (UNCLASSIFIED)

Jonathan Lighter wuxxmupp2000 at GMAIL.COM
Mon May 23 14:32:03 UTC 2011


You mean "could explain."

JL

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Mullins, Bill AMRDEC <
Bill.Mullins at us.army.mil> wrote:

> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       "Mullins, Bill AMRDEC" <Bill.Mullins at US.ARMY.MIL>
> Subject:      Re: fodder (UNCLASSIFIED)
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> >
> > Yes, that's what I meant. A word other than "fodder" is needed after
> > "worldwide", while "fodder" only makes sense in the slot currently
> > held by "bonanza". Which suggests editorial sloppiness rather than
> > semantic shift.
> >
> >
>
> "editorial sloppiness rather than semantic shift."  --- This explains
> much of what is noted on this listserv, I believe.
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>



--
"If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the truth."

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list