on voice

Eric Nielsen ericbarnak at GMAIL.COM
Sun May 27 09:09:15 UTC 2012


On 5/26/12, Victor Steinbok <aardvark66 at gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       Victor Steinbok <aardvark66 at GMAIL.COM>
> Subject:      on voice
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I am aware that voice is considered to be an instrument, on par with
> man-made objects that exude sound. And, I thought, the identifier "on
> the vocals" has been fairly ordinary. Perhaps I missed it, but,
> apparently, the current reference is "on voice", as in "The wonderful
> Ms. X on voice", presented by a band leader. Or is it not that new and I
> just failed to pay attention for the past 30 years?
>
>      VS-)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list