[Ads-l] "in spend"
Dennis During
dcduring at GMAIL.COM
Wed Jan 2 23:02:48 UTC 2019
For many purposes the distinction wouldn't be worth making.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019, 14:02 Dan Goncharoff <thegonch at gmail.com wrote:
> Yes, but...using "spend" tries to make all expenditure the same, even
> though it isn't. Some is investment, implying a future return, and
> some is cost. For example, the first cite in the first e-mail refers
> to costs, but uses spend.
> DanG
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:53 PM Dennis During <dcduring at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > "Cost" raises the question whether a given expenditure is an investment
> or
> > a cost in an accounting sense.
> >
> > "Spend" is conveniently short for "spending" or "expenditure", which are
> > neutral with respect to the potential issue of investment vs. cost.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 11:51 AM Dan Goncharoff <thegonch at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is it an attempt to avoid the word "cost"?
> > > DanG
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 10:01 AM Shapiro, Fred <fred.shapiro at yale.edu>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have nothing against neologisms, in fact I like them, but I hate
> > > business-y buzzwords like this use of "spend," which is common in the
> > > bureaucratic circles I travel in.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Fred Shapiro
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> on behalf of
> > > Stephen Goranson <goranson at DUKE.EDU>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 9:03 AM
> > > > To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> > > > Subject: "in spend"
> > > >
> > > > "....representing more than $400 million in spend on brand,
> comparison,
> > > and metasearch sites...."
> > > > (from a fairly recent start-up)
> > > >
> > > > "Chapter 5 provides detailed information on transaction data and
> source
> > > systems that are used in spend analysis." GB 2008
> > > >
> > > > "Almost all the reduction in Wales can be attributed to the
> reduction in
> > > spend by ITV." GB 2008
> > > >
> > > > "A reduction in spend on consulting of £870 million from £1.2
> billion to
> > > £04 billionn, or 71%." GB 2011
> > > >
> > > > Stephen
> > > >
> > > > PS Yes, good interview, Fred.
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > The American Dialect Society -
> > >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.americandialect.org&data=02%7C01%7Cfred.shapiro%40yale.edu%7C6fb61927297d4a3bc76b08d670bb04e1%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C636820345891556237&sdata=EeRs8P34Zk7XH0gPUh6P3CMkp2ZyNELS5iyfK3RO9tM%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dennis C. During
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list