Arabic-L:LING:Negative Reactions to Colloquial First
Dilworth Parkinson
dil at BYU.EDU
Thu Jun 7 17:47:28 UTC 2007
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arabic-L: Thu 07 June 2007
Moderator: Dilworth Parkinson <dilworth_parkinson at byu.edu>
[To post messages to the list, send them to arabic-l at byu.edu]
[To unsubscribe, send message from same address you subscribed from to
listserv at byu.edu with first line reading:
unsubscribe arabic-l ]
-------------------------Directory------------------------------------
1) Subject:Negative Reactions to Colloquial First
2) Subject:Negative Reactions to Colloquial First
-------------------------Messages-----------------------------------
1)
Date: 07 June 2007
From:"Schub, Michael B." <Michael.Schub at trincoll.edu>
Subject:Negative Reactions to Colloquial First
hi,
One underlying academic question is 'how low can we
go?' [limbo having been officially been damned {darned?} to limbo].
In about 1929(?) the Turks replaced their modified Arabic
script with a latinized script [similar to English] because the
former represented the phonology and morphology of Turkish as
pathetically and as inefficiently as it does all Arabic dialects.
Thus almost all academic textbooks worthy of the name for dialectal
Arabic are written in phonetic [again, similar to English] script.
The four years I taught Arabic at Yale (on a different planet),
only FUSHA was taught, WITHOUT ANY ORAL REQUIREMENT. Those students
who immediately went on to Middlebury (one of them is now Professor
of Middle Eastern Studies at MIT) reported that they were a bit lost
for about two weeks, and subsequently they became the mentors of many
advanced students who were clueless as to the case endings (al-
i`raab < root `\ ` r b \ = THAT WHICH MAKES ARABIC ARABIC) and
were unable to look up an Arabic word in an Ar--Eng dictionary!
Courses in pure MSA (modern FUSHA) tend to turn off students
who are intellectually lazy and merely want to PARTY. They have no
desire to do academically worthwhile homework--yet some of us must
accomodate them to have enrollment in our classes.
Sibawayhi is spinning in his grave like an atomic dreidel.
Ma`a ssalaama,
Mike Schub
P.S. according to this proposed plan, your Arabic students will be
totally ILLITERATE in Arabic after one entire year of university
instruction
Ibn Jinni is spinning in his grave like an atomic dreidel.
ms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
2)
Date: 07 June 2007
From:"John Joseph Colangelo" <yaacolangelo at hotmail.com>
Subject:Negative Reactions to Colloquial First
I completely disagree with this. I find students who worry about
learning
dialect completely incompetent in learning fusha and thus understanding
written material. I have colleagues who have spent years in Arab
countries
worrying about dialect not understand classical material at all! My
personal experience was learning MSA as well as classical Arabic
(religious
and literary texts) through classical Arabic and then, when living
there in
situ, learning the dialect rather quickly. And if Arabs respond in
English
it is because they want to practise their English at the expense of the
American students. You have to be a good speaker for them to answer in
Arabic. Maybe instead of giving the classes in English, you should
give the
classes in Arabic? Maybe when sending the students to an Arab
country, you
should send them to a program where it is forbidden to use English. Mind
you, I do believe that dialect should be taught but after acquiring
solid
foundations in classical Arabic not at the beginning. Which dialect
are you
going to teach? Why that dialect? Maybe students learning that
dialect wont
understand other dialects. Maybe using that dialect in other
countries will
earn the annoyance of natives in that country. There are many factors to
consider.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
End of Arabic-L: 07 June 2007
More information about the Arabic-l
mailing list