[Corpora-List] Do we still need language corpora?
Yorick Wilks
Y.Wilks at dcs.shef.ac.uk
Mon Feb 7 17:01:17 UTC 2011
No, "bl" alone wont do what you want--see
http://www.morewords.com/starts-with/bl/
there's bliss/bless/blond/blithe all in there too, though it probably is overall a rather negative list.
Yorick Wilks
On 7 Feb 2011, at 11:37, Francis Tyers wrote:
> El dl 07 de 02 de 2011 a les 16:36 +0000, en/na Justin Washtell va
> escriure:
>> I expect that phonesthemes hold the answer:
>>
>> Blark resembles baulk, blurt, bark and berk, as well as blargh
>> and blurgh and other sounds that people sometimes make when vomiting.
>>
>> Bl also begins bleed[ing] (and bloomin'), blood[y], blight[ed], blither, blather and bludgeon.
>>
>> I'm am looking forward to the day that computational models of
>> semantics, sentiment and translation explore/exploit this basic linguistic phenomenon.
>
> At the risk of cluttering the list further, I'll add that to me it has
> always conjured up the images of "bleak" and "dark".
>
> Fran
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Corpora mailing list
> Corpora at uib.no
> http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora
_______________________________________________
Corpora mailing list
Corpora at uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora
More information about the Corpora
mailing list