[Corpora-List] Do we still need language corpora?

[Justin Washtell]

> No, "bl" alone wont do  what you want

:-) If only more linguistic classification tasks were so simple that a decision tree with one node would do the job.

Justin Washtell
University of Leeds

________________________________________
From: corpora-bounces at uib.no [corpora-bounces at uib.no] On Behalf Of Yorick Wilks [Y.Wilks at dcs.shef.ac.uk]
Sent: 07 February 2011 17:01
To: ftyers at prompsit.com
Cc: corpora at uib.no
Subject: Re: [Corpora-List] Do we still need language corpora?

No, "bl" alone wont do  what you want--see
http://www.morewords.com/starts-with/bl/
there's bliss/bless/blond/blithe all in there too, though it probably is overall a rather negative list.
Yorick Wilks


On 7 Feb 2011, at 11:37, Francis Tyers wrote:

> El dl 07 de 02 de 2011 a les 16:36 +0000, en/na Justin Washtell va
> escriure:
>> I expect that phonesthemes hold the answer:
>>
>> Blark resembles baulk, blurt, bark and berk, as well as blargh
>> and blurgh and other sounds that people sometimes make when vomiting.
>>
>> Bl also begins bleed[ing] (and bloomin'), blood[y], blight[ed], blither, blather and bludgeon.
>>
>> I'm am looking forward to the day that computational models of
>> semantics, sentiment and translation explore/exploit this basic linguistic phenomenon.
>
> At the risk of cluttering the list further, I'll add that to me it has
> always conjured up the images of "bleak" and "dark".
>
> Fran
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Corpora mailing list
> Corpora at uib.no
> http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora



_______________________________________________
Corpora mailing list
Corpora at uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora

_______________________________________________
Corpora mailing list
Corpora at uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora