On using E-DataAid: WAS: Converting an Edat file into either a .xls or .txt file
David McFarlane
mcfarla9 at msu.edu
Fri Feb 15 15:58:27 UTC 2013
I too will beat the drum for E-Merge &
E-DataAid. For some years now I have said that
it is almost worth getting E-Prime for its superb
data handling facilities alone! No other
psychology programming platform compares in this
regard, no matter what other shortcomings E-Prime may have.
Sadly, it took me many years to discover this --
like many, I too initially treated E-DataAid as
nothing more than a tool to export data to Excel
or SPSS. I did not realize the full value myself
until a lab asked me to give them a tutorial on
E-Merge & E-DataAid, and when I finally went
through the manuals I was surprised!
So work through *all* of the E-Merge and
E-DataAid tutorials in the User's Guide and
Reference Guide that come with E-Prime, you will
find it *well* worth your trouble. You might
also look through Michiel et al.'s "The
E-Primer". Finally (shameless self-promotion
here), I devote an entire lesson of my online
video course to just this topic, with a guided
exercise to show much of what Michiel described.
-----
David McFarlane
E-Prime training
online: http://psychology.msu.edu/Workshops_Courses/eprime.aspx
Twitter: @EPrimeMaster (https://twitter.com/EPrimeMaster)
At 2/15/2013 10:03 AM Friday, Paul Groot wrote:
>You're right. E-DataAid features are often overlooked.
>
>Perhaps I was not clear about Excel: I meant
>that Excel has serious problems with many rows
>or columns. Although I think newer versions of
>Excel do a much better job now, so this might not be a problem for many users.
>
>paul
>
>On 13 February 2013 14:27, Cognitology
><<mailto:mspape at cognitology.eu>mspape at cognitology.eu> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>If you’re not YET doing it, I urge you to have
>another look at what is possible with e-DataAid.
>The reason is that I know many students 1) know
>SPSS fairly well, and a bit of Excel, and try to
>avoid E-***. Not saying that counts for you as
>well. Indeed, this is a bit of a shot in the
>dark, but with such sentences as “I have a large
>number of subject edat files (500+) and I like
>the column/row format that the Excel export
>option that E-DataAid uses so that I can easily
>convert the data into a format I like using spss
>syntax”, it’s difficult to avoid guessing! You
>might want to say something about what you’re
>planning to do, but in its absence, let’s have
>an example from my own life, and maybe it helps?
>
>· What I like is having a good amount of
>Repeated Measures ANOVA style formatted columns,
>say, RTs of 2x4 conditions, one row per subject.
>For SPSS. What I have is 500 .edats. Arggh, right?
>
>1. We merge all files to one big .emrg, which we then open in .edat
>
>2. We filter out those RTs we are not
>interested in, say, the ones in which an error
>occurs. Also, I don’t like trials 1:20.
>
>3. Now, we go to analyze, drag Subject to
>the Row, and any type of between-subject variable (sex, age, etc).
>
>4. Then drag ConditionP1vs2 to columns,
>drag ConditionQ1vs2vs3vs4 to columns. Drag the
>critical RT thing to the Data bit. Press Run.
>
>5. So, we should see a nice table of at
>least 500x8. Oops, it’s got two decimals.. why?
>Make that 4. Select all of it, copy the bunch to excel.
>
>6. Inside excel, underneath the two rows
>with variables (rows A and B), insert a new row
>(say C). Enter the wonderful formula =A&”_”&B and drag it all across row C.
>
>7. Select row C, copy, go stand in an
>empty bit, paste special: values only, and
>transpose. Copy that, go to SPSS, paste in
>variables: now, that’s descriptive indeed.
>
>8. Copy all the values over to SPSS (but
>you’ll have to reassign string values from numeric for some columns).
>
>
>
>These 8 steps, lengthy as they may seem, take me
>about 2 minutes, and I think it’s a great workflow.
>
>TLDR? Try E-DataAid, it’s ridiculously simple,
>really rocks, and SPSS is best avoided as they
>make it slower and buggier with every next release.
>
>
>
>PS: Paul, I find Excel not at all slow with
>large data-files? Much faster than SPSS, at
>least, or at least it has been between excel
>2007 and 2010 (2013 beta was running very slow
>here); it does not cope very well with large and
>lengthy formulas that need repeated
>recalculation and take up more than hundreds of MBs, though.
>
>
>
>Best,
>
>Michiel
>
>
>
>
>
>From:
><mailto:e-prime at googlegroups.com>e-prime at googlegroups.com
>[mailto:e-prime at googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Daniel
>Sent: 11. February 2013 23:02
>To: <mailto:e-prime at googlegroups.com>e-prime at googlegroups.com
>Subject: Re: Converting an Edat file into either a .xls or .txt file
>
>
>
>Yeah, I will probably just end up splitting it
>using a SPSS syntax script (I am not very
>familiar with Matlab yet), it will be a little
>bit tedious but faster than doing it manually.
>
>
>
>Thanks for the input.
>
>On Friday, February 8, 2013 6:49:09 PM UTC-5, Daniel wrote:
>
>I have a large number of subject edat files
>(500+) and I like the column/row format that the
>Excel export option that E-DataAid uses so that
>I can easily convert the data into a format I
>like using spss syntax. Is there a faster way to
>convert all of these subject files into the
>excel format, some sort of way to iterate over
>all files in a folder, instead of having to open
>each one and export them separately?
>
>
>
>Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "E-Prime" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to e-prime+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to e-prime at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
More information about the Eprime
mailing list