Versatility?
Lise Menn
lise.menn at Colorado.EDU
Mon Mar 21 00:43:41 UTC 2011
Aya, there are too many good articles in The Mental Lexicon to list
here - which ones to look at depend on the reader's specific
interests. Here's the publisher's link so people can check out the
contents:
http://www.benjamins.com/cgi-bin/t_seriesview.cgi?series=ml
NB: Issue 3:2 is currently available online as a free sample.
Lise
On Mar 20, 2011, at 5:49 PM, A. Katz wrote:
> Lise,
>
> Could you share some references to specific article that are point?
>
> Best,
>
> --Aya
>
>
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Lise Menn wrote:
>
>> Gary Libben and his group have done a great deal of
>> psycholinguistic work on what people consciously and unconsciously
>> know about compounds; it's not necessary to rely on anecdote and
>> introspection. Check out the journal The Mental Lexicon. Obviously
>> no one has all the answers, but linguists shouldn't ignore the very
>> good science that has been done in this area.
>> Lise
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Tom Givon wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe it would be useful to add that among all the pieces of
>>> quaint exemplars lie some general principles that have to do with
>>> both the semantic & phonological changes that affect compound
>>> expressions. Once the two parts co-vary in all (or most) contexts,
>>> and once the meaning of the compound drifts away from the original
>>> composite meaning of the two parts, there is a growing semantic
>>> incentive to cease interpreting it as a composite, given that the
>>> predictability of the compound meaning from its parts gets lower &
>>> lower over time. In parallel, once two phonological sequences
>>> becomes fused as a single word, assimilation & reduction make the
>>> similarity to the two original parts less & less obvious. This is
>>> a typical "iconic conspiracy" in compounding & co-lexicalization.
>>> Ther rest is, as usual, history. TG
>>> ====================
>>> On 3/20/2011 4:53 PM, dharv at mail.optusnet.com.au wrote:
>>>> I can attest that even in the aircraft industry plenty of people
>>>> don't realize that helicopter means helical or twisting wing.
>>>> At 3:45 PM -0600 20/3/11, Sherman Wilcox wrote:
>>>>> On 20 Mar 2011, at 15:26, Pamela Munro wrote:
>>>>>> The first time the observation about the analyzability of /
>>>>>> rooster/ was made here, I thought, sure, I know the ending -/
>>>>>> ster/, but what is /roo/?
>>>>> I routinely ask my students to analyze helicopter. No one can.
>>>>> Everyone thinks the word has an -/er/ suffix. Some of them come
>>>>> up with /heli-/ having to do with the sun, but then they can't
>>>>> figure out what the sun has to do with helicopters, or what -/
>>>>> copt/- might mean. Something that chops the sun's rays?
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sherman Wilcox, Professor
>>>>> Department of Linguistics
>>>>> University of New Mexico
>>>>> Albuquerque, NM 871131
>>
>> Lise Menn Home Office: 303-444-4274
>> 1625 Mariposa Ave Fax: 303-413-0017
>> Boulder CO 80302
>> http://spot.colorado.edu/~menn/index.html Professor Emerita of
>> Linguistics
>> Fellow, Institute of Cognitive Science
>> University of Colorado
>>
>> Secretary, AAAS Section Z [Linguistics]
>> Fellow, Linguistic Society of America
>>
>> Campus Mail Address:
>> UCB 594, Institute for Cognitive Science
>>
>> Campus Physical Address:
>> CINC 234
>> 1777 Exposition Ave, Boulder
>>
>>
>>
Lise Menn Home Office: 303-444-4274
1625 Mariposa Ave Fax: 303-413-0017
Boulder CO 80302
http://spot.colorado.edu/~menn/index.html
Professor Emerita of Linguistics
Fellow, Institute of Cognitive Science
University of Colorado
Secretary, AAAS Section Z [Linguistics]
Fellow, Linguistic Society of America
Campus Mail Address:
UCB 594, Institute for Cognitive Science
Campus Physical Address:
CINC 234
1777 Exposition Ave, Boulder
More information about the Funknet
mailing list